Kimber Montana 338 Win Mag

BigTimber

FNG
Joined
Feb 15, 2015
Messages
6
Location
Alberta, Canada
Hello

Does anyone have any experience with a Kimber Montana in a 338 Win Mag ? I own a 3006 in a Montana which is a pleasure to carry and shoot but to pick up one of the big boys I figure that would be a nice addition to the Kimber family, any experiences?
 

GKPrice

Banned
Joined
Sep 27, 2014
Messages
2,442
Location
Western Oregon
I agonized for a couple of months about one at a local gun shop for sale, could not get my head around it - the 338 and 300 win mag kind of break from the pack in weight though, I think they are as nice as any other Kimber Montana but just a little heavier (which might not be such a bad thing in a 338 Win Mag ??)
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
23
Location
No Tellum Creek
Ted....I know that this thread is over two years old now, but I'm curious whether you're still using your 338 win Montana still. Just picked one up for a steal of a deal and was wondering about loads, setup, etc. I'm thinking about lopping of 2-3" of that long barrel too. Thoughts?

Anyone else out there have on of these?
 

GKPrice

Banned
Joined
Sep 27, 2014
Messages
2,442
Location
Western Oregon
Ted....I know that this thread is over two years old now, but I'm curious whether you're still using your 338 win Montana still. Just picked one up for a steal of a deal and was wondering about loads, setup, etc. I'm thinking about lopping of 2-3" of that long barrel too. Thoughts?

Anyone else out there have on of these?

I think 23" is about right for a "hunting" 338 win mag, very efficient cartridge - I never did buy the one I was so tempted by but have been "thinking" (JUST thinking) about what a Tikka SL 7mm RM would be like changed to a 338 Win Mag by J.E.S. reboring - It would be light for sure ....
 

deadwolf

WKR
Joined
May 12, 2013
Messages
2,498
Location
Anchorage, AK
Mountainside, I have a montana in 300win, it weighed in at 6lbs 12ozs when I got it home. I had the 26" barrel cut down to 24", and a few months ago installed a titanium bolt handle. It sits at 6lbs 6 ozs now. Those two items cost me $155 total, not bad. I could get the aluminum trigger guard as well, but in 300wm I don't know how light I really want to go! : ) I've actually had this rifle for sale, and almost had it sold or traded a couple times, but it's so nice and shoots great so I can't bring myself to do it. Shoot, even GK and I almost had a trade for it at one point (apologies for being indecisive). It's a redundant caliber for me but I can't let it go.

So while it's not a 338 like yours, I would have zero reservations in chopping it to 24" or 23" as GK said above, you will not lose a thing and will only gain in having a lighter, handier rifle.
 

coiloil37

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
184
Location
Oz
I've got a Montana in .338 with a 23" barrel and it now sits in a Pendleton stock with bottom metal. Initially I was worried about such a lightweight in this caliber but it's easier to shoot/ less perceived recoil then my old browning X bolt in .338
I'm still whittling away at the weight but with aluminum bottom metal and the titanium knob I should be sitting at 7lbs 2 oz total. I thought I could have it under 7 lbs but I sent the stock back to have the LOP increased and it put on a little weight.
I've only shot 250 accubonds over RE19 but I've got some 225 ttsx loaded to try and a couple hundred 225 interlocks for playing with this summer.

That Pendleton stock was a great way to lose the pregnant feeling of the 8400 stocks. It feels as slim now as an 84l.

e69948472f2871c2ad044e210e41ea99.jpg


3a2ee83f6e5b50306fcf112352300f84.jpg
 
Last edited:

luke moffat

Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
102
I've got a Montana in .338 with a 23" barrel and it now sits in a Pendleton stock with bottom metal. Initially I was worried about such a lightweight in this caliber but it's easier to shoot/ less perceived recoil then my old browning X bolt in .338
I'm still whittling away at the weight but with aluminum bottom metal and the titanium knob I should be sitting at 7lbs 2 oz total. I thought I could have it under 7 lbs but I sent the stock back to have the LOP increased and it put on a little weight.
I've only shot 250 accubonds over RE19 but I've got some 225 ttsx loaded to try and a couple hundred 225 interlocks for playing with this summer.

That Pendleton stock was a great way to lose the pregnant feeling of the 8400 stocks. It feels as slim now as an 84l.

e69948472f2871c2ad044e210e41ea99.jpg


3a2ee83f6e5b50306fcf112352300f84.jpg

That is cool. Didn't know you could get a Kimber stock with bottom metal...I wanna see more pics of that project!

Hard to justify an extra 1.5-2 pounds for a 338 WM over my 338-06 Kimber (mine is 4 pounds 14 oz) but a stock change would be pretty sweet for bottom metal.
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
23
Location
No Tellum Creek
Thanks for the pics coiloil37...that gives me an idea of what chopping a few inches will look like.

To be honest, it's hard to justify anything over my 308 Montana, but I couldn't pass up the deal. $750 out the door, with a scope and rings to sell, might bring the rifle cost down to $675. Have a 223 Montana as well, so this one was more to round out the stable :D All set up to load 338 win mag as well, so no extra components needed.

I know I could dig to find where to get an aluminum trigger guard and ti bolt handle, but does anyone have the links or numbers handy?
 

coiloil37

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
184
Location
Oz
That is cool. Didn't know you could get a Kimber stock with bottom metal...I wanna see more pics of that project!

Hard to justify an extra 1.5-2 pounds for a 338 WM over my 338-06 Kimber (mine is 4 pounds 14 oz) but a stock change would be pretty sweet for bottom metal.

Your at 4 lbs 14 oz scoped?

The only problem with putting bottom metal on a Montana is kimber only makes steel bottom metal and it's heavy at 6+ ounces. My plan is to buy some Winchester 70 aluminum with the oberndorf style release from PT&G and modify it by 1/8" to fit. If it works I'll save over 4 ounces.
When I had this rifle sitting in its factory stock I was 7lbs 2oz scoped with the tally rings and 2.5-8x36 I've got on it. The only thing(s) I hated was cycling the bolt to clear the magazine and that perch belly. It's hard to tell from a set of pictures but here's the factory stock vs the Pendleton around the action where it felt prego. If you've held a 8400 and a 84l or 84m you already know what I'm talking about.

a51ef7521d55340d204ada7c8d50c2c3.jpg


de8815c3e7eef0f21414cf56bf18f248.jpg


8b52f66ce101fcec727007195c27c256.jpg


c8b7d48173a0911e7c92364e05dd85f8.jpg


fa66b3b7fac648a07ab1372a791a0409.jpg


I got the stock with bottom metal for less then I sold the factory Montana stock. It lost the perch belly but it had a 12.5" lop when I got it. As I'm 6' tall the lop didn't work. I contacted Wayne and he told me he could take it out to a 14" lop for $50. His turn around was about two weeks and it came back looking perfect.
It still balances and fits very well and if I get it to 7lbs 2 oz it won't be that heavy considering what it is but part of me wants this in the 6lb range. If I could modify a wildcat stock to work I should be able to drop her to about 6lbs 8oz scoped.
If a guy wanted bottom metal he's going to be money ahead starting with a kimber hunter and adding a stock like this vs modifying a Montana.

For a barrel comparison here's another pic with a half grown fawn and a 13-27" Harris bipod.

2506b02f5cf630f821b38a56b59c682c.jpg
 

luke moffat

Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
102
Your at 4 lbs 14 oz scoped?

The only problem with putting bottom metal on a Montana is kimber only makes steel bottom metal and it's heavy at 6+ ounces. My plan is to buy some Winchester 70 aluminum with the oberndorf style release from PT&G and modify it by 1/8" to fit. If it works I'll save over 4 ounces.
When I had this rifle sitting in its factory stock I was 7lbs 2oz scoped with the tally rings and 2.5-8x36 I've got on it. The only thing(s) I hated was cycling the bolt to clear the magazine and that perch belly. It's hard to tell from a set of pictures but here's the factory stock vs the Pendleton around the action where it felt prego. If you've held a 8400 and a 84l or 84m you already know what I'm talking about.

a51ef7521d55340d204ada7c8d50c2c3.jpg


de8815c3e7eef0f21414cf56bf18f248.jpg


8b52f66ce101fcec727007195c27c256.jpg


c8b7d48173a0911e7c92364e05dd85f8.jpg


fa66b3b7fac648a07ab1372a791a0409.jpg


I got the stock with bottom metal for less then I sold the factory Montana stock. It lost the perch belly but it had a 12.5" lop when I got it. As I'm 6' tall the lop didn't work. I contacted Wayne and he told me he could take it out to a 14" lop for $50. His turn around was about two weeks and it came back looking perfect.
It still balances and fits very well and if I get it to 7lbs 2 oz it won't be that heavy considering what it is but part of me wants this in the 6lb range. If I could modify a wildcat stock to work I should be able to drop her to about 6lbs 8oz scoped.
If a guy wanted bottom metal he's going to be money ahead starting with a kimber hunter and adding a stock like this vs modifying a Montana.

For a barrel comparison here's another pic with a half grown fawn and a 13-27" Harris bipod.

2506b02f5cf630f821b38a56b59c682c.jpg

Nice man...it looks really good. I can live with the blind magazine for now but cool to know the option. Pretty darn neat and looks great! I know exactly what you are talking about with the 8400s feeling preggo compared to a 84M or 84L....one of the reasons I sold my 300 WSM 8400 Montana, just felt so "Fat" and I am not talking about weight even compared to my .308. Cool to know that stock slims down the feel of it.

No my 338-06 is 4 pounds 14 oz naked. 6 pounds 2 oz with a 17 oz VX-6 2-12X42 on it. Thinking about going to a 2-7X33 VX-2 mainly due to the fact that I don't shoot beyond 400 yards with my rifles and 7X is plenty for that work and that would get me down to under 5 pounds 10 oz scoped.

But I am not sure I need to go that light....already got a rifle in the works, a Kimber, that should go 4 pounds 4 oz or so scoped.
 
Top