USFS closure reporting

UtahJimmy

WKR
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
884
Location
SLC, UT
I was just told over the phone by an employee at a Ranger District, that an entire basin is closed, not just the main trail that runs through it. I cannot find anything on the government website that announces such a claim. They don't even list the trail as closed on the website. A 'Recreation Update' put out by the same Ranger District in July says:

"ALL HIKING TRAILS ARE OPEN, HOWEVER, THERE MAY STILL BE SOME SNOW DRIFTS ON SOME OF THE TRAILS'

Is there somewhere I should be looking other than fs.usda.gov to determine whether or not I can access this public national forest land?
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
1,661
Talk to someone besides the gal at the front counter.
Ask for the recreation specialist or even better district ranger.
If you want pm me where and I'll see what I can did up. I know several FS employees in Utah.
 

Beendare

WKR
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
8,247
Location
Corripe cervisiam
You think the USFS updates their website regularly........bwahhaha, thats funny.

Yeah, i feel your pain. The FS doesnt make it easy on us sometimes....but like the poster above states, talking to the right person makes all the difference.
 

KClark

WKR
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
471
Location
Oleta
I hope it's different in Utah but here in CA some USFS employees have no problem lying straight to your face, especially when it comes to land use.
 

530Chukar

WKR
Joined
Jun 27, 2016
Messages
418
Location
Out West
It has never made much sense to me to close down a particular trailhead or area when they can be accessed without restriction from over a dozen other points in many cases.
 
OP
UtahJimmy

UtahJimmy

WKR
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
884
Location
SLC, UT
You think the USFS updates their website regularly........bwahhaha, thats funny.

Yeah, i feel your pain. The FS doesnt make it easy on us sometimes....but like the poster above states, talking to the right person makes all the difference.
Haha yeah their websites do suck, but the update was from last month. That's pretty dang regular by goberment standards!

But seriously, they are also allowing cattle grazing in this basin... so I think I should be able to access it as well?!?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

sneaky

"DADDY"
Joined
Feb 1, 2014
Messages
10,025
Location
ID
Ha, if it's in Utah Mossback probably has a big buck or bull spotted and doesn't want anyone screwing it up for them

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
 
OP
UtahJimmy

UtahJimmy

WKR
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
884
Location
SLC, UT
Just to follow-up, I spoke with a Ranger last week. He said he wants to get into the area and make an assessment. Then he'll clear the area and make sure it's safe before opening it back up.

I'm glad I spoke with a Ranger because he was very straight-forward and indirectly told me that being in this area will not get me a ticket.

As always, thanks for the suggestions and help!
 

BuzzH

WKR
Joined
May 27, 2017
Messages
2,229
Location
Wyoming
Why wouldn't an area be safe?

Theres about a million reasons why, but some I've seen...

Wanted fugitives camping/hiding out in certain drainages.

Then there's things like pot farms and meth labs.

Areas where active fires are burning, areas where heavy amounts of standing dead trees and high wind warnings collide.

Dead animals (moose, elk, livestock, etc.) attracting grizzly bears and black bears.

Landslide areas, washed out trails, roads, etc.

Reclamation work on old mines.

The list goes on and on and on...
 
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
1,232
Location
Bothell, Wa
Why wouldn't an area be safe?

Standing dead, burnt trees can randomly fall over for a few years. Often the forest service will first bring in fellers and drop the obviously dangerous trees followed by a crew to spread native grass seeds. Also deadfall that has yet to settle can be quite scary when stepped on just right.
 
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
1,232
Location
Bothell, Wa
Yes. Sort of. When they move in they move in with force. To the point it's not really something most are willing to put up with. Legally speaking I don't think they can keep you out but between the big rigs, noise and people common sense says let them do their job and move on.

I've only run into it a couple of times so would love to hear from someone who actually does this type of work
 

BuzzH

WKR
Joined
May 27, 2017
Messages
2,229
Location
Wyoming
So, if I'm understanding this right, a forest service employee basically decides if we can access our public land? Is that correct?

Yes, usually a District Ranger or Forest Supervisor...when its essential to carrying out operations and keeping the public safe. It's rarely done and only done for good reasons, like those I mentioned.

What problem do you have with that?
 

530Chukar

WKR
Joined
Jun 27, 2016
Messages
418
Location
Out West
Theres about a million reasons why, but some I've seen...

Wanted fugitives camping/hiding out in certain drainages.

Then there's things like pot farms and meth labs.

Areas where active fires are burning, areas where heavy amounts of standing dead trees and high wind warnings collide.

Dead animals (moose, elk, livestock, etc.) attracting grizzly bears and black bears.

Landslide areas, washed out trails, roads, etc.

Reclamation work on old mines.

The list goes on and on and on...

Some of these reasons end up turning into a joke. One of our local forests had a wildfire several year ago and the FS still has the area closed to the public due to the danger from trees. YEARS LATER. There is a time and place for the closures but other times they are abused.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Jason__G

FNG
Joined
Mar 11, 2016
Messages
66
Location
Bend, Oregon
In the PNW, forest and wilderness closures happen from time to time. This year, a large chunk of the Three Sisters Wilderness is closed due to several fires in the area. For example:
fseprd555206.jpg


If you notice, that is the Pacific Crest Trail on the East. Lots of through-hikers having to go around this year. Another trail closure is waiting for them 30 miles later.

Just one Forest has several large fires burning in multiple areas and numerous closures. We had planned on hunting some of these areas, and if we wanted to, we could access from other trails outside the closed area, but that would be monumentally stupid. We don't need to hunt these areas that badly. The areas will be better to hunt next year after they recover. The last thing fire managers need to worry about are impatient people wandering close to an active fire with weapons. Fires can shift quickly and move faster than you or I can run.
Fire crews have enough to deal with. The best plan is to stay out, give them space to do their jobs, and hunt the back-up plan.
 

Jason__G

FNG
Joined
Mar 11, 2016
Messages
66
Location
Bend, Oregon
And since this thread was started based on Utah, here is the Utah Sat:
crefl1_A2017222180128-2017222181338_250m_ut-000_143.jpg


Utah has been cloudy lately. I had to go back to the 10th to get an image without a lot of cloud cover.
Doesn't look like lots of fires, or lots of snow, even at the higher elevations, but the local guys will know better than I.
 

Bcole82

FNG
Joined
Jun 3, 2017
Messages
37
Has it been cloudy or was it smoke? I'm in Southern Idaho and we are just starting to be rid of all the smoke from various fires.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top