So some updates regarding my little project.
the rifle is a Rem 700SPS SS in 300RUM.
Mods to date:
Action "accurized lvl 1" by Rocky Mountain rifles
Trigger Tech drop in
Terminator brake
B&C Alaskan TI stock
Action bedding
All up weight with scope and rings 8.6lb. The vortex viper I am running now is a pig-considering replacements.
I am just messing around with charges at this point and am getting sub moa on basically all charges. My question is what is a better indicator of potential accuracy, vertical stringing with little horizontal deviation OR horizontal deviation with little vertical variance.
I am interested most in 87.5-88Grns (low charge) and 91grns (hot) these three being the tightest, 91 stacking them with almost no horizontal deviation.
I haven't started with seating depths yet, running 200Grn AB's for this test at nosler's recommended COAL.
Thanks
the rifle is a Rem 700SPS SS in 300RUM.
Mods to date:
Action "accurized lvl 1" by Rocky Mountain rifles
Trigger Tech drop in
Terminator brake
B&C Alaskan TI stock
Action bedding
All up weight with scope and rings 8.6lb. The vortex viper I am running now is a pig-considering replacements.
I am just messing around with charges at this point and am getting sub moa on basically all charges. My question is what is a better indicator of potential accuracy, vertical stringing with little horizontal deviation OR horizontal deviation with little vertical variance.
I am interested most in 87.5-88Grns (low charge) and 91grns (hot) these three being the tightest, 91 stacking them with almost no horizontal deviation.
I haven't started with seating depths yet, running 200Grn AB's for this test at nosler's recommended COAL.
Thanks