Trying to find information on exactly what the Leica 1600-R and Sig Kilo 2200MR provide in terms of angle vs. true horizontal distance to target. Does each provide both?
Thank you for the help - I'm in the middle of attempting to choose a range finder that can reliably range deer at ~800m, and my current choices are between the Leica 2000-B, Leica 1600-R, and Sig Kilo 2200MR. I don't need ballistics table features (would rather use a dedicated device or app for that), so the 2000-B's ballistics features really aren't what I'd consider "value-added" for my particular wants at this moment in time.
I'm a little afraid of the Sig rangefinders, reading here and there that they seem to be hit-or-miss.
Any opinions founded in experience are welcomed. Are there any rangefinder options that I'm currently leaving outside of my consideration? I.e., any 'new hotness' that I've missed the word on?
Thank you.
Thank you for the help - I'm in the middle of attempting to choose a range finder that can reliably range deer at ~800m, and my current choices are between the Leica 2000-B, Leica 1600-R, and Sig Kilo 2200MR. I don't need ballistics table features (would rather use a dedicated device or app for that), so the 2000-B's ballistics features really aren't what I'd consider "value-added" for my particular wants at this moment in time.
I'm a little afraid of the Sig rangefinders, reading here and there that they seem to be hit-or-miss.
Any opinions founded in experience are welcomed. Are there any rangefinder options that I'm currently leaving outside of my consideration? I.e., any 'new hotness' that I've missed the word on?
Thank you.