big10hunter
WKR
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2012
- Messages
- 717
Is the vortex 11-33 HD too small of power to even consider as a backcountry scope? I like how light it is.
Is the vortex 11-33 HD too small of power to even consider as a backcountry scope? I like how light it is.
The Nomad is a great spotting scope for what it is. You just have to understand what you're buying and consider how you're going to use it. There are certainly better options for magnification, clarity and light transmission. Are you going to be glassing side hills/mountains a quarter or half mile away? Are you going to be Glassing mountains/side hills 4 miles away? Are you sitting and glassing all morning, then going back to camp to come out later that afternoon and pull a stock on something you saw bedded down? There are many different scenarios that will make this decision.
Personally, I found that if I actually need a spotting scope I'd prefer to take the Swaro ATX. If its not something i want to carry, then the chances are I probably don't want to carry the nomad either.
This all just depends on what game you are after and how you want to hunt them.
Nomad?
Pretty sure his question was about a vortex razor hd 11-33x50
It's great glass for the money. For the reasons these guys have said, figure out what you need to use it for and then choose your size.
The Nomad was replaced with the Diamondback Series. The Razor line is a whole different animal. The 11-33X50 is one awesome spotter to two miles out. Yes you can view farther than that with it but two miles & in it's incredible! It's my goto spotter & I own & use all 3. As a dealer that's easy for me to do! (grin) I would highly recommend it with zero concerns!
ElkNut1
I spoke to vortex about and they said they split the nomad into 2 scopes. For someone who was after the lighter weight, compact aspect of the nomad they would want the razor 11-33 and for the person who wanted the lightweight high magnification option they would go to the viper series. They said the diamondback series was a completely different thinking in spotting scope design and was solely targeted after the lower cost market.
Sounds like you talked to an uninformed individual. No way can you compare the flagship high end vortex line (razor) to their bottom of the line (budget) products (old nomad and diamondback).
Comparing the nomad to any of the razor line is like saying the Nikon monarchs are the same/comparable to the new swaro hd el's.
Vortex Razor is a great spotting scope line that competes well with the big dogs. And the 11-33x50 is a great little spotter for it's intended purpose. It competes well with the high thought of Nikon 50mm ED scope and those 2 are a better comparison than anything else in the Vortex line up.
The Razor series is as Paul said a whole different animal than any of the other spotting scopes in their line up. They are NOT a Nomad or a Diamondback, or a Viper.
My guess ( just a hunch)- midwest_gearhead has not looked through a Razor 11-33x50 scope.
My guess (just a hunch) stephen b doesn't even actually know what the optical differences are between the razor and viper series. But ya never know he could surprise me.