tdhanses
WKR
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2018
- Messages
- 5,739
Just saw that he is stepping down at then end of this year.
There were no real issues with his ethics. He was targeted for being part of the Trump administration. If he’d been part of the Obama administration there would never have been the first investigation. Unless and until the Obama deep state holdovers are run out of the government all political appointees will be harassed incessantly with frivolous investigations. Civil war is coming.He was enjoying his position a bit much. 15 ethics investigation in under two years 6 still active.
There were no real issues with his ethics. He was targeted for being part of the Trump administration. If he’d been part of the Obama administration there would never have been the first investigation. Unless and until the Obama deep state holdovers are run out of the government all political appointees will be harassed incessantly with frivolous investigations. Civil war is coming.
A bunch of the BHA members are tickled pink I'm sure. They hated him because we was a conservative that understood federal law concerning the land use legacy the BLM and National Forests were created for. I won't pretend to speak for the organization as a whole concerning their personal stance on him though. What I will say is with a guy like Zinke, the BHA could have really presented itself as the premiere group fighting for hunting and fishing access rights. They may have indeed worked with him in earnest. But, I doubt it highly as we'd sure heard of all the victories if so. Because, under Zinke we sporting men and women sure had them. At least we didn't have to worry about stupid rules concerning public land use. Like the lead ammo ban the USFWS director implemented the last day of Obama's presidency.
I don't know what laws he broke. Only what laws he was supposed to have tweaked to his own benefit. He seemed to be doing fine by me and all sportsmen. But, when special interest groups use politics to define their stance, things get ugly quickly. If he truly broke the law with intent then sobeit. If not, he has fell victim to the political woes segregating this country.
A bunch of the BHA members are tickled pink I'm sure. They hated him because we was a conservative that understood federal law concerning the land use legacy the BLM and National Forests were created for. I won't pretend to speak for the organization as a whole concerning their personal stance on him though. What I will say is with a guy like Zinke, the BHA could have really presented itself as the premiere group fighting for hunting and fishing access rights. They may have indeed worked with him in earnest. But, I doubt it highly as we'd sure heard of all the victories if so. Because, under Zinke we sporting men and women sure had them. At least we didn't have to worry about stupid rules concerning public land use. Like the lead ammo ban the USFWS director implemented the last day of Obama's presidency.
I don't know what laws he broke. Only what laws he was supposed to have tweaked to his own benefit. He seemed to be doing fine by me and all sportsmen. But, when special interest groups use politics to define their stance, things get ugly quickly. If he truly broke the law with intent then sobeit. If not, he has fell victim to the political woes segregating this country.
I'm interested to see who they will replace him with. My worst nightmare is Rob Bishop.
Your entire rant is nothing but politics defining your stance then you close out by accusing others of doing the same thing? This is a little incoherent, even for you.
The truth or the matter is that he is steping down not because of BHA or any group for that matter. He is steping down because he knows that there is no way he survives an ethics investigation and hearing.
If you want people to stop being partisan hacks, or as you said " political woes segregating " each other. Why dont you start with yourself?
I'm interested to see who they will replace him with. My worst nightmare is Rob Bishop.
The only thing I can say about Zinke he was the best of the worst. Because there were alot worse names on the list that he came off of.
Careful what you wish for as you just might get it.
Zinke really screwed up with these violations especially the Hatch violations. I cant for the life of undertand why politicians think they can do whatever they want. Maybe on second thought I can undstand after all the country is full of partisan hacks who will defend anything politicans do as long as it's a politician from their party.
Our political dysfunction is looked at as an indictment of politicans, however the truth is it's an indictment on ourselves.
If it was in the New York Times, it must be true.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
James, save that crap for your regional BHA pub night. My stance has nothing to do with politics. Only what I said. I don’t care the party preference of anyone as long as their outlook is not tainted by their political motives. Here was an appointee that made his commitment of hunting and fishing access premiere. Why anyone who claims the same is their priority was against him is beyond my comprehension.
I used the lead ban as an example of politics defining policy. That guys who disposed Zinke, never complained one second here when that was passed. It takes a political moron to suggest they care about hunting rights but, unwilling to piont that out. While these same people hated Zinke because he believed in responsible resource extraction. Just one example of my first post. Pointing out reality is just pointing it out.
You can label anything the way you want. It doesn’t make it that way.