The scope would be placed in a jig, which could be as simple as two lower ring halves mounted to a picatinny rail fixed in a vice. The reticle would then be centred on a tracking test target whilst in the jig. The scope would then be dropped in a rig similar to that shown in the video, but would...
The actual drop portion isn’t repeatable and could damage the scope, which is a separate issue. Test firing introduces the imprecision of the rifle and ammunition and adds human error to the equation which can easily be removed. I’m not suggesting your testing is invalid and I appreciate what...
If they oriented it ninety degrees and checked it on a collimation jig before and after it would be a very useful test, far more useful in fact than dropping a rifle and then test firing which introduces many uncontrollable variables.
If you don’t already have all these questions answered and a clear vision of what you want to end up with then you don’t need and will not benefit from a custom
It’s easy to change yourself.Unscrew the objective cap. You may need a small strap wrench but it’s usually only hand tight. Turn the objective lense carrier clockwise until parallax is absent at the desired range. If unscrewing the lense carrier to reduce the parallax free distance be careful...
No device that uses a battery to assist in locating animals or making the shot seems reasonable to me, it is also fairly easy to enforce as regulations go.
Listing a scopes mag range as lowest power X highest power, eg 3x12. When they invariably leave off the objective diameter I feel like asking if they really have a fixed 3x with a 12mm objective.
Using “stock” when they mean stalk. I think it’s the same group of people
Hi Form
Thanks fo conducting these tests
Do you have any experience with the pmii 3-12x50? More specifically the model with single turn turrets, parallax fixed at 300m and non illuminated P4L reticle. Your thoughts would be very much appreciated.