.223 for bear, deer, elk and moose.

Stu

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 29, 2019
Messages
223
I have found the 77 TMK the easiest heavy .224 to tune bar none, in quite a few rifles
I’ll second that. My experience across 6 guns was also just as good with the 73 ELD. For folks suggesting a separate bullet for practice, I’d suggest using it due to lower cost than the SMK, and closer BC to the TMK.

I’ve found the zero to be within .1-.3 mil in both axes for my rigs.

I zero turrets for the 77 TMK.
For the 73 ELD I simply adjust my windage zero on the turret and already have the elevation offset for zero set in the profile for the ballistics calculator. That means all I have to remember is to adjust the windage turret.

I can optionally adjust the elevation turret, but I usually don’t bother since this is practice and practically all shots are ranged and calculated anyway.
 

SouthPaw

WKR
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
754
Location
Northern CA
I’ll second that. My experience across 6 guns was also just as good with the 73 ELD. For folks suggesting a separate bullet for practice, I’d suggest using it due to lower cost than the SMK, and closer BC to the TMK.

I’ve found the zero to be within .1-.3 mil in both axes for my rigs.
I've found this to also be true. The 75eldm did not work out for my tikka 1:8 but I practice at 600ft elevation. The 73eldm has been great as a practice bullet, and I have an accurate load for 77tmk for this hunting season. Interestingly, the 73eldm has a very slightly better BC than the 77tmk (AB data) and I'm getting an extra 80fps with it over the TMK.
 

Stu

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 29, 2019
Messages
223
I've found this to also be true. The 75eldm did not work out for my tikka 1:8 but I practice at 600ft elevation. The 73eldm has been great as a practice bullet, and I have an accurate load for 77tmk for this hunting season. Interestingly, the 73eldm has a very slightly better BC than the 77tmk (AB data) and I'm getting an extra 80fps with it over the TMK.
I really wanted the 75 ELDs to work too and I spent way too much time and money on them. the 73s just don't seem to care about the gun, chamber/seating depth at all. My go-to, non finicky, precision load for 223/5.56 is the 73 ELD with basically any primer and any amount of Varget.
And yeah, definitely faster.

Where can a fella find the AB data?
 

amassi

WKR
Joined
May 26, 2018
Messages
3,658
I really wanted the 75 ELDs to work too and I spent way too much time and money on them. the 73s just don't seem to care about the gun, chamber/seating depth at all. My go-to, non finicky, precision load for 223/5.56 is the 73 ELD with basically any primer and any amount of Varget.
And yeah, definitely faster.

Where can a fella find the AB data?
There's a book or an app. The app updates every time a new bullet is added to the library

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stu

Lawnboi

WKR
Joined
Mar 2, 2012
Messages
7,766
Location
North Central Wi
I really wanted the 75 ELDs to work too and I spent way too much time and money on them. the 73s just don't seem to care about the gun, chamber/seating depth at all. My go-to, non finicky, precision load for 223/5.56 is the 73 ELD with basically any primer and any amount of Varget.
And yeah, definitely faster.

Where can a fella find the AB data?
The AB app is worth the 30 bucks.

I found it much more accurate than sierras data.
 

Stu

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 29, 2019
Messages
223
There's a book or an app. The app updates every time a new bullet is added to the library

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Ha, I have the app. Just dug into the listed BCs in the library that i already have set up. No wonder they seem to drop so similarly. Doh!

Guess that shows how much I use my Vortex Fury IIs with applied ballistics these days instead. Thanks @Formidilosus
 

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
8,226
Yeah, I’m all about it. No complaints. Wish the ballistics solution came up a little faster, but that’s splitting hairs I reckon.

Nah, it is a bit slow to pop up, but given all around usability, it’s solid I think.
 

Stu

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 29, 2019
Messages
223
Nah, it is a bit slow to pop up, but given all around usability, it’s solid I think.
I don’t own any of its competitors to compare to, but have been using it for a little over a year now. I’m happy with the glass, really like the continuous scanning/ranging, and was surprised at how easy and quick it is to get a windage calculation when there’s time. That’s a feature I figured I’d never use.
 
Joined
Jan 1, 2022
Messages
431
Location
Montana
I spent the last week reading all 91 pages. The only thing I find hard to believe is the post regarding the malfunctioning SWFA 1-6 :ROFLMAO:.
 
Last edited:

BLJ

WKR
Joined
Jan 19, 2020
Messages
2,042
Location
WV
Any velocity numbers from a 16” barrel with 8208 XBR? LGS got some in and may give it a go. I’m at 2470 with Varget now. I’d like to do a little better than that. Thanks.
 
Top