8X or 10X for CO Elk hunt

Joined
Mar 1, 2017
Messages
12
Location
Michigan
Looking for some advice.

I am planning my first DIY backcountry archery elk hunt in CO this fall. I am going to order some binos within the next few weeks. I am set on brand but still up in the air on magnification.

I am in Michigan and would like to use the binos for whitetail and other species back home.

What are your thoughts on 8 or 10? I am not a trophy hunter so counting points is not going to be a big thing for me.
 

Northernpiker

WKR
Classified Approved
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
1,780
Location
Eau Claire, Wi.
What size Bino do you want? 8x30 or 8x32 are nice for carrying. If you go 42 objective or larger you can get 8x or 10x. I would guess most people go with 10's but 8's have advantages also.
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
1,794
Location
Colorado
I go with the 10x binoculars. If they are too much (like looking for brow tines in the timber) I use the slight magnification of my rangefinder.
 

AKMAN

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
191
Location
Alaska
When not worried about weight, my 8x42 Ultravid HDs are hard to beat. I'm a sucker for lower power binoculars though.
More light, easier to hold steady when you're on a boat or out of breath and if I need more than 8x I probably need a lot more than 10x.
I've been on the hunt for a nice 6x; Maven makes one, but I've never seen any of their products in real life so I'm a bit hesitant to jump in.

My vote is 8x. :cool:
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2017
Messages
364
I like compacts myself. 8x25 or so is perfect. Light and handy. Plus you don't need a big pouch hanging of your chest to store them.
 

ericF

WKR
Joined
Oct 4, 2016
Messages
628
Location
CO
If you are going to use them dual purpose, then 8x42 would be better than 10x42. You will have no problem finding elk on the next ridge with the 8x and they will be better for the short range that you will probably use them the most on back home.
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
352
Let your eyes determine for you. I can see better out of 8x42 as it is a steadier picture and also reduces eye strain. I got lasik several years ago and am pushing 20/10 so by my logic I already have 2x eyes ;)
 

LostArra

WKR
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
3,435
Location
Oklahoma
I agree with those that say either will be fine but while bow hunting I find myself in situations (elk and whitetail) where I am using the bino with one hand, bow in the other. For me, 8X is better for that.
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
625
Location
Littleton Co
I have both leica 8x32 and leica 10x42 really like my 8x32 for elk hunting . A little lighter and easier to hold. If I need more I grab a 50 mm spotter
 

outdoor_matt

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jan 19, 2014
Messages
220
Location
Alberta
When not worried about weight, my 8x42 Ultravid HDs are hard to beat. I'm a sucker for lower power binoculars though.
More light, easier to hold steady when you're on a boat or out of breath and if I need more than 8x I probably need a lot more than 10x.
I've been on the hunt for a nice 6x; Maven makes one, but I've never seen any of their products in real life so I'm a bit hesitant to jump in.

My vote is 8x. :cool:

Yep. I've got the exact same pair and hunted elk with them last year. Never felt like I needed the extra mag, unless the object was miles away and I would have needed the spotter anyways. Having a broader field of view is very nice. Especially for a duel-purpose back east bino.
 
Top