Ballistic calculator vs real dope

WKR

WKR
Joined
Jun 14, 2019
Messages
1,478
Anyone have any major differences between what they punched in on a ballistic calculator and the actual results in the field with their handloads?
I started stretching out a load i developed for my 7MM rem mag and I'm a little perplexed. At 400 yards I had a difference of .5 moa between what the calculator said and my point of impact. Which is acceptable but then at 500 I needed to dial 8 moa to be on target when the ballistic app said only 6.5 moa.

So whats going on? I'm using a magneto speed to get the data used in My calculations. I was shooting into a 8-10 mph head wind but that shouldn't constitute a 1.5 moa drop.
 

Ucsdryder

WKR
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
5,485
I’ve been told the hardest to calculate is bc. Lots of manufacturers fudge the number plus bc changes with speed. So you might need to play around with your calculator and increase/decrease bc to see if you can get the numbers to match with your true dope.
 

BBob

WKR
Joined
Jun 29, 2020
Messages
3,587
Location
Southern AZ
What scope are you using? Are you sure of what the elevation unit is? There are still scopes out there that use IPHY (inch per hundred yard) and not MOA. They are not the same. Some early March scopes used an older and not used much anymore MIL measurement (they have changed it in current scopes). It is not the same as most everyone else's current and modern MIL. My point is there are many errors possible in setting up the APP to get correct data out of it. It is also not uncommon at all to need to "True" your inputs to get correct data out. Search for ballistic APP truing and you find tons of info to read and learn. Lots of info on how to get a ballistic APP working correctly and trued over on Snipers Hide. There is no reason why you cannot get it setup correctly and get good data out of it if you figure out what needs to be fixed or trued.
 

Wrench

WKR
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
5,595
Location
WA
I use chronograph to get spreads down and ball park the velocity. I shoot to 600 and record drops for velocity dope. 800 out for bc validation.
 

Wrench

WKR
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
5,595
Location
WA
Great point on the scope....tall target test to reveal what your actual click values are. .25" might be .24 or 255.....that's where the rubber meets the road and everything has to be repeatable.
 

Travis Bertrand

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2012
Messages
3,872
Location
Reno,NV
something is wrong, What calculator are you using? You always will have to adjust FPS, and BC to true your calcs
 

Rock-o

WKR
Joined
Aug 15, 2019
Messages
649
I go the opposite direction. Field data -> calculator. "Try Dope"... "Weaponized Math". It works. No chronograph needed. Get all your calculator inputs correct and you're solid. Quick and easy.
 
OP
WKR

WKR

WKR
Joined
Jun 14, 2019
Messages
1,478
I'm shooting a 169 gr bullet with a estimated G1 bc of .550 at an avg muzzle velocity of 3080 fps. I've tried inputting some different numbers in the calculator but it doesn't really coincide with my real world data.
Maybe I should just keep the same point of aim, walk it back and measure drops.
It just confuses me why the calculations are that far off
 
OP
WKR

WKR

WKR
Joined
Jun 14, 2019
Messages
1,478
What scope are you using? Are you sure of what the elevation unit is? There are still scopes out there that use IPHY (inch per hundred yard) and not MOA. They are not the same. Some early March scopes used an older and not used much anymore MIL measurement (they have changed it in current scopes). It is not the same as most everyone else's current and modern MIL. My point is there are many errors possible in setting up the APP to get correct data out of it. It is also not uncommon at all to need to "True" your inputs to get correct data out. Search for ballistic APP truing and you find tons of info to read and learn. Lots of info on how to get a ballistic APP working correctly and trued over on Snipers Hide. There is no reason why you cannot get it setup correctly and get good data out of it if you figure out what needs to be fixed or trued.
Scope is a Zeiss v4. Its a true moa scope.
 

Rob5589

WKR
Joined
Sep 6, 2014
Messages
6,243
Location
N CA
I'm shooting a 169 gr bullet with a estimated G1 bc of .550 at an avg muzzle velocity of 3080 fps. I've tried inputting some different numbers in the calculator but it doesn't really coincide with my real world data.
Maybe I should just keep the same point of aim, walk it back and measure drops.
It just confuses me why the calculations are that far off
"Estimated bc." Guessing you're using Hammers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WKR

Travis Bertrand

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2012
Messages
3,872
Location
Reno,NV
I'm shooting a 169 gr bullet with a estimated G1 bc of .550 at an avg muzzle velocity of 3080 fps. I've tried inputting some different numbers in the calculator but it doesn't really coincide with my real world data.
Maybe I should just keep the same point of aim, walk it back and measure drops.
It just confuses me why the calculations are that far off

What bullet exactly?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
OP
WKR

WKR

WKR
Joined
Jun 14, 2019
Messages
1,478
"Estimated bc." Guessing you're using Hammers.
Yup thats right, do you think there estimation can be that far off? To get 7.75 moa at 500 on the calculator I have to punch in a way lower bc
 

Travis Bertrand

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2012
Messages
3,872
Location
Reno,NV
0162761c195dbc4ba6a5104ccfec640b.jpg

With your rough data. This is what applied ballistics shows


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top