Brush Buster
Lil-Rokslider
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2017
- Messages
- 290
I know the 215 is proven but has anybody tried hunting with the 200.20x? Looks like a little lower bc but I would imagine better velocity with lower recoil.
Really interested in these for my 21' win mag if it cant push the 215s like they would need. My biggest worry is them having to jump a mile in a chamber cut for a 215. Ive seen very little on game results from the 200 when scouring forums, seems mostly used by 308 fclass guys
3K should be very easy then in my opinion or more. I have gotten 3K with a 215 from select 26" tubes with H-1000 and a little more from 28" with H-1000. 3100 with a 215 from a 28" and N570. So the 200X could be a real screamer.
wind gypsy, what distance did you do the comparison?
Has anyone tested to see how much of an air void from the lead to tip on the 200?
Sorry, didn’t realize I didn’t post yardage on my comparison. That was at 1000 yards. The 215 would pass the 200 in velocity between 900 and 1000 yards.3K should be very easy then in my opinion or more. I have gotten 3K with a 215 from select 26" tubes with H-1000 and a little more from 28" with H-1000. 3100 with a 215 from a 28" and N570. So the 200X could be a real screamer.
wind gypsy, what distance did you do the comparison?
Thank you, I figured 1K was the test data. So very usable in many hunting scenarios if the Terminal performance is what we would expect. ThanksSorry, didn’t realize I didn’t post yardage on my comparison. That was at 1000 yards. The 215 would pass the 200 in velocity between 900 and 1000 yards.
Thanks! so right between the .284/195 and the .308/215 Not sure it means that much, but one of the visible differences we can at least keep an eye on.By my measuring method I get .406" on the 215 and .351" on the 200.20x
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk