Chest binocular power

Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Messages
359
Hey all,
Looking to get a new set of chest binos for western elk and deer hunting. Wanting something I can use glassing from some distance but also something I can use for still hunting. Mainly trying to decide between 8x42 and 10x50. Thoughts?
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
3,758
Location
Edmond, OK
I’m far from any expert but I prefer 8x42 for my elk and whitetail hunting. Tried the 10x42 but found I like the wider FOV and “easier to hold steady” nature of the 8’s. I’m giving up some magnification using 8’s but it’s much easier for me to pull them out and use them when I’m out of breath from climbing.
 

BBob

WKR
Joined
Jun 29, 2020
Messages
3,587
Location
Southern AZ
I'd say 10x42 is probably the most common all around I see. My personal most often used all around binocular for many many years is 10x32 EL's. They only get used hand glassing, larger glass comes out for tripod use.
 

Carpenterant

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jul 4, 2020
Messages
213
I think either size will suit you well. I went through the same decision a few years ago and landed on 8x42, but I don’t think anyone would be wrong going 10x50 or 10x42. I prefer the wider fov and don’t feel I’m missing much with 2x less magnification.
 

Brendan

WKR
Joined
Aug 27, 2013
Messages
3,871
Location
Massachusetts
10x42 fan here. I think if I went to 10x50, I'd need a larger size chest rig, which I don't want to do. I run an AGC Kodiak CUB.
 

NoWiser

WKR
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
708
I started out with 8x42 and thought I was missing out, so went to 10x42. It was a mistake and I'm back to 8x42 and they are all I'll ever carry on my chest. They are great off a tripod as well. I just grabbed some 15x but they'll be strictly for tripod use.
 

Rodéo

WKR
Joined
May 7, 2018
Messages
884
Location
CA
8x42 chest bino and 65 spotter in the pack or big glass (12x+ x 50mm+).

8's are much easier to hand hold for me and the FOV on a tripod is more preferable for me than the extra 2x of 10's. Also, I ran 50mm bino's in my chest harness for a while and they were just too cumbersome and annoying to pull out for a quick look.
 
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
1,936
Location
Santa Rosa, CA
You could always split the difference with the 9x45 maven B2. I couldn’t be happier with mine. Maybe I’ll upgrade to ELs some day but I could buy used Mavens twice and have money left over for what the Swaros cost.
 
Joined
Oct 13, 2017
Messages
317
Location
Rockies
I used 10x42 last year. I personally can't hold a 10x42 steady enough to really study the view. I'm on 8x42 now for hand holding.
 

FlyGuy

WKR
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
2,087
Location
The Woodlands, TX
I prefer my 8x32 (el) for elk hunts. Usually inside timber and lighter glassing. Went on an Aoudad hunt and found that I really needed the 10x42 (SLC) in that wide open environment with heavy glassing sessions to find invisible animals. Took those same 10x42 on my elk hunt last year and hated how narrow the field of view was.





You can’t cheat the mountain
 
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Messages
462
Spent 5 years with 10x42s on the chest...works fine and is a good go between.. I now use 6x32s, and they are superior for most neck bino applications....for one handed operation, quick scans, thick cover, super early low light conditions, spotting movement, and distances sub 1000yds, they're incredible (maven 6x32). But....for big glassing jobs, at long distances, I bust out the EL 12x50s on on tripod.
 

JRMiller

WKR
Joined
Apr 11, 2020
Messages
579
Location
Texas
10x42's mostly
But if i'm glassing primarily with my my spotting scope and just using the binos to cover larger areas quicker, i 'll bring 8x42's
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
78
I’ve opted to ditch my chest binos and only use my 7x rangefinder for short distance scanning in thick timber. I’ll let everyone know how it worked for me at the end of the season.
 

FlyGuy

WKR
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
2,087
Location
The Woodlands, TX
I’ve opted to ditch my chest binos and only use my 7x rangefinder for short distance scanning in thick timber. I’ll let everyone know how it worked for me at the end of the season.

I had a buddy that tried that and it was terrible. He was using the sig I’m pretty sure. Couldn’t hold it steady, eye strain. Narrow FOV. Hope you have better luck.


You can’t cheat the mountain
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2019
Messages
2,956
If my options are either 8s or 10s, I'd take the 10s as they are better suited to where and how I hunt.

If there were no restrictions, then I'd take 12s (ELs) or 15s (SLC). Still would use my Sig range finder for quick looks.

Disclosure: I own SLC 10s, SLC 15s, and Viper HD 8s.
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
78
I had a buddy that tried that and it was terrible. He was using the sig I’m pretty sure. Couldn’t hold it steady, eye strain. Narrow FOV. Hope you have better luck.


You can’t cheat the mountain

Thanks for sharing.

I forgot about FOV! Better look at some good low power binos for my chest again.
 

ZDR

WKR
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Messages
892
I just moved from 8x32 to Swaro 10x30 and really like them so far. Need more time with them but my impression is I lost little in the move and gained better clarity for longer distances. I shot the MAF 3D shoot last weekend and it was nice to see details on 80yd+ targets that I ordinarily could not see with my 8x. I think they are going to be keepers.
 
Top