If you can only have one binocular magnification for hunting.

Joined
Nov 5, 2020
Messages
31
Brand-agnostic, which magnification do you lean towards when hunting: 8x42 vs 10x50? I'm mostly in a stand about 120-200 yds away from the feeder. I had both Athlon 8x42 and 10x50 with me to try out. I like the 8x when panning around the area looking for movements, but the 10x was handy once the buck/spike was closer to the feeder. The 8x was serviceable also for antlers verification, hence I'm leaning towards making the 8x my go-to. It's smaller and lighter also. Just wanting to see what everyone else is carrying.
 

D.Rose

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Mar 21, 2020
Messages
225
I always end up grabbing my Maven 8x30. Seems like for general use they do everything pretty good.
 
OP
anthonytexas
Joined
Nov 5, 2020
Messages
31
Seems like most are opting for the 40's objective. I was always under the impression that 50 objective lets more lights in = better clarity with darker lighting. Guess quality of glass has a lot to do with it, too.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
7,571
Location
In someone's favorite spot
Seems like most are opting for the 40's objective. I was always under the impression that 50 objective lets more lights in = better clarity with darker lighting. Guess quality of glass has a lot to do with it, too.
Yes, the quality of glass and quality of the coatings can make a poor 50 look less bright than a good 40. This is why I say a high quality pair of 8x32's is all I really need. My 8x32 Conquests are as bright as 10x42 Viper/M7/Meopro class bins if not brighter.
 
OP
anthonytexas
Joined
Nov 5, 2020
Messages
31
12x50 all day but i'm not much of a bow hunter. No offense intended but if you're sitting a feeder does it really matter?
I think you meant "stand". If you're in a feeder, you got bigger problems. LOL. But point taken. Being in a stand I can usually get better stability for my arms, so the shaking that comes with a higher magnification isn't much of an issue. However, I do stalk sometimes and need the added flexibility. 12x might be too shaky for me in that instance.
 

TheGDog

WKR
Joined
Jun 12, 2020
Messages
3,271
Location
OC, CA
Just one? 10x42 top-tier glass is all you need. You can see crazy far with good glass 10's and a tripod. (Even when your eyes are sh!t)

But if where you live it's mostly woodland/thicker stuff where likely handheld most of the time no tripod and closer-in, than very likely I'd go 8's.

Significant improvement in perceived steadiness when handholding w/ 8's. (notice I said perceived steadiness, you're still shakin' just not "seeing" it as much is all)

Yeah.. ya know... just like your clothing, I find I end up liking having options that more closely suit each different situation.
 

Q child

WKR
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
399
Between 8x42 and 10x50 - I would choose the 8s. Don't get me wrong though, 10x50s are awesome. 8x42s are just more versatile in my experience - due to their larger field of view, lighter weight and smaller package.
A lot of options out there though. As others have chimed in, I would probably go with 10x42s instead of either if I was to choose just one binocular to rule them all.
 
Top