I've been looking through a lot of binos lately and have noticed that some don't seem to be the power they state. i'm not saying they are incorrect but possibly a user bias of some sort imparted by other characteristics of the bino. for instance, side by side comparison of the maven b2 9x45 and the swaro 10x42 slc left me with mixed feelings. the b2 was the lesser magnification but it appeared to my eye that it was at least 1x larger than the slc, and i'm not just talking field of view. both at distance and near i felt the trees were larger in frame and the font of bill boards were larger. this was the case when comparing the b2 to other 10x binos i have as well. so, is this a trick from a larger objective or am i just seeing things? is it possible that maven put out an 11x45 and mis labeled it?