MAPLand Act, waddya know?

robby denning

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
14,990
Location
SE Idaho
Hey Roksliders
we try to support these conservation orgs pursuits when it makes sense.

What do you know about this Act that's going before Congress?


Seems to be something that we'd want to support, but I don't always completely understand the issues. Let me know what you know.

We'd be support TRCP on this project if we decide it's a go. Below is a blog post from Rokslider member and TRCP rep @mmw194287

Thanks!

 

jek5224

FNG
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
68
Location
OH
This is the first I have heard of it, but it seems like a good idea (without having read the bill). Basically it looks like federal agencies would be required to make knowledge of already-existing public easements more accessible to the public. It also opens up discussions/awareness regarding the landlocked parcels of public land. It sure seems easier for the government to convince a landowner to sell an easement over their property rather than selling the entire parcel. The only people I can see being opposed to this (at least in the hunting community) would be those who have spent some time digging through the microfilm in their county recorder's office and know of public easements that they want to keep hidden from the masses.
 

jek5224

FNG
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
68
Location
OH
After reading the bill I still think it is a good idea, at least in theory. I imagine there will be some eyebrows raised at the thought of spending 31 million dollars in the next three years to establish federal easement and road/trail databases, and an undetermined amount going forward. There are certainly worse ways to spend the money, though.
 
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
3,711
"and for other purposes "

I can imagine the regulatory agencies that would also use this information. But overall, from the sounds of it, as long as the public has access to the information... it sounds like it could be beneficial.
 

Trial153

WKR
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
8,187
Location
NY
After reading the bill, this makes total sense to me. To have a modern foundation of information going forward will only help access and will make it easier for public land users to gain information .
 

sneaky

"DADDY"
Joined
Feb 1, 2014
Messages
10,015
Location
ID
As long as it isn't a go- round to identify landlocked parcels that they'll push to sell off instead of creating easements to access. You can't trust anything the govt does 100%. It'll cost $31mil for the govt to make the database, and less than 10% of that if a quarantined computer junky was paid to do it.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

ODB

WKR
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
3,734
Location
N.F.D.
As long as it isn't a go- round to identify landlocked parcels that they'll push to sell off instead of creating easements to access. You can't trust anything the govt does 100%. It'll cost $31mil for the govt to make the database, and less than 10% of that if a quarantined computer junky was paid to do it.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Boom.

“Those lands are locked in by private lands with no opportunity to create an easement. The highest and best use of the land for the people of _______is to sell them to the adjacent landowners and put the money in the _________budget.”
 

Joelweb

FNG
Joined
Sep 30, 2016
Messages
85
Location
Big Sky Country
Thanks, ODB and Sneaky. I appreciate your concern about people trying to sell off public land, and can assure you this bill is about supporting access acquisition.

Several bills have passed in recent years that are focused on boosting public access to inaccessible lands. These include the permanent reauthorization of the Land and Water Conservation Fund and the passage of the HUNT Act.

Specifically, the Land and Water Conservation Fund includes the following provision:

“(c) Recreational public access.—

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the amounts made available for expenditure in any fiscal year under section 200303, there shall be made available for recreational public access projects identified on the priority list developed under paragraph (2) not less than the greater of—

“(A) an amount equal to 3 percent of those amounts; or

“(B) $15,000,000.

At full funding, that's $27 million a year specifically for access acquisition through LWCF!

And the HUNT Act includes the following regarding the development of public land priority access acquisition lists:

(b) Priority lists required.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and biennially thereafter during the 10-year period beginning on the date on which the first priority list is completed, the Secretary shall prepare a priority list, to be made publicly available on the website of the applicable Federal agency referred to in subsection (a)(1), which shall identify the location and acreage of land within the jurisdiction of each State or regional office on which the public is allowed, under Federal or State law, to hunt, fish, or use the land for other recreational purposes but—

(A) to which there is no public access or egress; or

(B) to which public access or egress to the legal boundaries of the land is significantly restricted (as determined by the Secretary).

Because most permanent easements are still held on paper file, even the federal agencies do not have a thorough understanding of where they do and do not have access to their own lands, let alone all of us not knowing. That needs to be remedied if we want the BLM and Forest Service to have the greatest impact in opening their lands to the public -- especially given these awesome programs they have at their disposal. The public also has a right to know where permanent, legal access has already been secured.
 
OP
robby denning

robby denning

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
14,990
Location
SE Idaho

303TrophyHusband

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
269
Location
MT
Here is an update on it. Looks like 150+ companies jumped on to sign.


I'm just spit balling here but would it be possible for some of these companies to also pledge dollars to the initial efforts to get the programs up and running if/when the bill passes?
 

303TrophyHusband

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
269
Location
MT
As long as it isn't a go- round to identify landlocked parcels that they'll push to sell off instead of creating easements to access. You can't trust anything the govt does 100%. It'll cost $31mil for the govt to make the database, and less than 10% of that if a quarantined computer junky was paid to do it.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Not all, but in some of the cases of those landlocked parcels, the landowner has no interest in purchasing, why would they need to? They pay a minor lease fee to the state or fed that is WAY below what they would pay in property tax, and are still able to treat it like private lands and reap the benefits of the land.
 
Top