- Dec 4, 2018
Further point, other companies have better warranties that replace products that don't have replaceable components. Should it matter if it was their Victory or Conquest line? Just because your product is 'bomb-proof' or 'top-of-the-line' doesn't mean you can't also provide a good warranty service. This applies doubley-so for those product lines that aren't up to snuff. Why not have a better warranty for a product you know is more likely to break / get scratched? Better question as a consumer, why would I buy it?
Those products are typically inferior at the same price point—razor vs conquest I would choose the conquest again and just be more careful with them or live with a lens scratch because they are much better glass. I think if i totally destroyed the conquests they would have replaced them, although I wasn’t the original owner so who knows.