Purpose of a 6.5?

Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
4,623
Location
Colorado
Hypothetically if a guy has a .300 win mag. Good all around caliber for all big game animals. What’s the purpose or need of a 6.5? Other than to just have more rifles?
 

Salmon River Solutions

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Jul 5, 2018
Messages
1,111
Location
North Idaho
I’m building a 6.5 Sherman Short. A long smaller diameter bullet, you can sling it way faster and it catches way less wind, vs a heavier bullet out of a .300.

Compared to my .300 win mag it has substantially less drop at 1000 yards and half the wind deflection


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Trr15

WKR
Joined
Feb 16, 2014
Messages
1,696
Location
Wyoming
Don't have a 6.5, but my first thought would be less recoil without a brake...and to have more rifles, especially one in a trendy caliber. :)
 

CBar

FNG
Joined
Oct 30, 2018
Messages
58
Location
Etna, Wyoming
This is a big debate among some of my buddies right now, most of which run a .300 WINMAG for elk and something like a .243 for antelope and deer. One camp argues the 6.5 is the new savior "do it all" caliber capable of replacing the need for multiple rifle, and potentially at a weight savings (Ex. Kimber Mountain Ascent rifle weights in at just 4lb 13 oz chambered in 6.5). However, the flat-shooting and recoil reduced 6.5 is really meant for distances where it outperforms calibers like the .270 (beyond 500 yards) which, the other camp argues, isn't really hunting anymore...
 

JWP58

WKR
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
2,090
Location
Boulder, CO
Less recoil, ease of self spotting and more shooting. 'Form is pretty adamant that less recoil equals better shooting.
 

Stid2677

WKR
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
2,349
The 6.5 was conceived to make the most of long ogive, high BC bullets. Seems that flat shooting, accurate and low recoil work well for killing critters too.
 

FURMAN

WKR
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
1,793
If a bullet is pushed at x velocity with y bc in one caliber it will have the EXACT same external ballistics(drop/drift) as a bullet of another caliber at x velocity and y bc. The larger bullet will have more energy. This is the ONLY way to compare apples to apples. A guy saying his 6.5 has less wind drift has chosen a cartridge that is faster negating the apples to apples comparison. Everyone will have their own reason for choosing a cartridge. For me the reason I sometimes shoot the smaller cartridges is because it is easier to spot your own shots in odd field positions. With deer or antelope the extra energy of the 30 is not really needed so I feel there is one advantage to the 6.5 or 7. With elk I would rather have the extra energy and it is very noticeable when shooting bigger game.
 

howl

WKR
Joined
Dec 3, 2016
Messages
463
Location
GA
The first 6.5 I bought was when I realized I could mirror the trajectory of a .300 WM with a lot less hullabaloo. The surprise was when deer started dropping like flipping a switch instead of running fifty yards. Sometimes magnum performance is not only not needed, it isn't even wanted.

Some people say it's horses for courses or some such.
 

SniperHunter

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Mar 4, 2019
Messages
120
6.5 CM has roughly 25% better results in drop and drift, with less recoil. If you re going out 700 yrds+ the difference is significant.
If not you are GTG. I think this topic has been covered in depth, here and elsewhere.
 

Reburn

Mayhem Contributor
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Messages
2,881
Location
Central Texas
Less recoil.
Given if you don't reload rounds are cheaper
Similar performace to a 270, 25-06, light 7mm generally with a BC advantage. Which works well for medium sized, medium skinned game. Deer, Pronghorns, coyotes, many antelope species in africa, Sheep.

Goats ,elk and moose ill pack a 300.
 
Last edited:

desertcj

WKR
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
647
Location
Central CA
Nothing wrong with a 6.5mm, BUT if you already have a 300 win mag...I would personally go lighter on my second rifle. 6 Creedmoor or .243. A .257 Robert's or 25-06 could be nice as well.
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
1,794
Location
Colorado
From a guy that has a .300 and a .340, I picked up a 6.5 with the sole intent of practicing form and fundamentals until I could consistently hit a man-sized target at 1000 yards. I have found the 6.5 so fun to shoot at long range that I get bored inside of 500 yards (shooting steel, not animals) on 1 minute sized targets.
What this did for me was encourage me to practice more, and learn more about wind, and to compete, which meant more practice and more learning.

TLDR, don’t need a 6.5 if you have a .300, but it’ll surprise you and likely lead to you being a better rifleman.
 

sam hill

FNG
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
15
Location
British Columbia
Having only one rifle for the past 26 years a Remington KS Mountain rifle in .300 win mag, a 6.5 is on my hit list. The idea of an accurate long range cartridge with less recoil than the old Win mag is growing on me.
 

wentright

FNG
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
28
I took a whitetail last year at 400 yard with a 6.5-284. Very accurate and doesn’t kick much thought it kicked less than my light weight 7mm-08
 

EastMT

WKR
Joined
Dec 19, 2016
Messages
2,872
Location
Eastern Montana
I shoot a 300 also. I bought a 260 for my wife this year for a caribou hunt. I went to get it all sighted in, set up, reload testing. I came back and told her she was going to have to buy her own dang rifle haha. Absolute pleasure to shoot. I haven’t hunted with it myself but she took a nice caribou with 140 PT.


I have yet to be begin to procrastinate.
 

Yote Klr

FNG
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
66
Location
Indiana
Hypothetically if a guy has a .300 win mag. Good all around caliber for all big game animals. What’s the purpose or need of a 6.5? Other than to just have more rifles?
I have 6AI, two 6mm CM, 260rem, two 6.5wsm, 264wm, 26 nosler, 270wsm, 27Nosler two 7RM, 7wsm, 28Nosler, 308win, 300wsm, 300wm, 300RUM... it all started as a simple hobby to keep me from my best friends Jack D. and Jim B.

It's a disease. Sickness.
If I had any common sense I'd have a 300wm and be done with it.
 
Top