Shooting Myths

Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
831
Location
Becker Ridge, Alaska
I am not a long-range shooter...in 40+ years of hunting, I've taken only 1 shot beyond 200 yards.
However, I enjoyed Ryan Cleckner's book: Long Range Shooting Handbook, A Beginners Guide to Precision Rifle Shooting.

Ryan talks about some shooting myths:
1) Focus on the target.
A major take home message from Ryan is focus on the recticle, not the target...
"I remember an old television Kung Fu episode where students are learning to shoot archery. The master walked behind each student and one by one the shot an arrow at a stuffed bird for a target.
Prior to each shot, the master would ask the student to describe the bird and each student before missing the target would describe the shape and color of the bird. The master asks young grasshopper what he sees, and grasshopper replies "Master, I can not describe the bird, for I can only see it's eye.
Although this is a great example of aim small/miss small, I would change it slightly if I was teaching sniper students. I would ask you what is the color of the birds eye, I the student would respond "I do not know master, as I can only see my reticle [cue Kung Fu music]"

2) High power scopes.
Also related to focusing on the reticle....
"Too shaky? Turn that magnification down! Try it sometime and you will be surprised. As long as there is enough magnification to see the target, you'll probably shoot better on lower magnification. This happens for two reasons: First, by getting the target image smaller,
you're less likely to look past your reticle and focus on the big, pretty target.
Second, you won't see all the errors or movement in your scope, so you'll be less likely to overcorrect and yank on the trigger when you think the reticle is finally lined up in the center.
Scopes don't make you shoot better, they just magnify your errors.

3) Follow Through.
"Proper follow through is important.
Some believe that without follow through, you disturb the rifle ever so slightly changing the bullet's path as it went down the barrel. I do not buy into this reasoning. Notice next time what is happening while you are following through, the rifle is violently kicking back into your shoulder---which is surely more movement than your finger could impart.
Follow through is important to me because it shows that I was adding steady pressure and allowing the rifle to fire.
Remember its a process. Focus on the reticle, steady pressure on the trigger."

4) Cold bore shots.
"There is a theory that the first bullet (or 2) out of a clean barrel
will impact in a different location on a target than the subsequent shots. Yes, I've seen a difference on some barrels between bullet impacts when the barrel is perfectly clean and when it is a little dirty. However, I don't subscribe to the theory that this "clean bore" shot should be recorded in a DOPE book because it will go to this alternate location each time.
What I see, more often than not, is that the effect of the first flyer is caused by a "cold shooter" and not a cold or clean barrel. It's reasonable to think that a shooter who just got to the range and plopped down behind the rifle might not employ the proper fundamentals and might make a bad first shot or two until they have warmed up.
When I used to teach full-time, every single morning started making the students dry fire before they shot their first group of the day. I would have them call their shots and I wouldn't allow them to shoot live ammo until they were able to have 5 perfect dry fires. Amazingly, once the students started doing this, the effects of their cold or clean barrels went away!
Wait a minute, didn't I say that there's a noticeable effect on barrel performance based on whether its raw metal or completely fouled? Yes. The difference is in the overall accuracy.
It is a fallacy to think that the cold clean barrel shot always goes to the same spot. Instead, a raw barrel might shoot 1 MOA while an adequately broken in and fouled barrel might shoot 1/2 MOA."
 
Top