Weight Weenies

Joined
Sep 22, 2013
Messages
6,389
Stop and think about the coin you spend cutting weight. The lightest pack, the lightest shelter, the lightest sleeping bag or quilt...etc. So let's say you weigh 200lbs and your 10 day pack weights 75. Your hiking weight (with boots and clothes, cell phone, and such is about 280lbs give or take. You spent hundreds (probably thousands) to cut your pack weight 10-12lbs. Is that smarter than losing 10-12lbs and carrying slightly heavier and much less expensive gear? I'm asking for a friend.

lightened backpack.jpg
 

Smithb9841

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
May 26, 2019
Messages
293
Not everyone is going to perform better weighing 10-12lbs less... if someone is over weight than yea that will help but for people who are already at a healthy weight losing weight will usually include losing strength as well.
 

Copen1822

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Feb 24, 2015
Messages
156
Getting pack weight down is more about not bringing stuff you dont need then it is about buying special gear.

I see no reason to pack extra weight if I can help it.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 

Jon Boy

WKR
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
1,715
Location
Paradise Valley, MT
Getting pack weight down is more about not bringing stuff you dont need then it is about buying special gear.

I see no reason to pack extra weight if I can help it.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk


This. You will be within 5 lbs of some of the lightest packs with budget gear. I know because I've done it.
After a certain point I wanted every advantage I could get.
I do get where Bruce is coming from though as I pack 2-2.5 lbs of food a day and refuse to eat granola bars for 75% of the day.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
952
Location
Colorado
This. You will be within 5 lbs of some of the lightest packs with budget gear. I know because I've done it.
After a certain point I wanted every advantage I could get.
I do get where Bruce is coming from though as I pack 2-2.5 lbs of food a day and refuse to eat granola bars for 75% of the day.


I don’t know about ‘within 5 pounds’ when comparing UL year to budget gear....
 

Jon Boy

WKR
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
1,715
Location
Paradise Valley, MT
I don’t know about ‘within 5 pounds’ when comparing UL year to budget gear....
Obviously you won't be doing winter goat hunts with this stuff and the longevity will be lacking but I ran a lot of this stuff or similar for many years well into montanas rifle seasons and would again if I fell on hard times. Everything else in a pack should be the same as far as weight with kill kits, possible pouches etc can find cheap puffys, fleeces and rain gear very easily as well. I ran an Alaskan pack frame and a dry bag on it that didn't weigh much more than my exo.
9ca1d15c70bc14c9aa7ac44b3633b226.jpg
64c6b9875a38c76d55c56c6e2aef26bb.jpg
55582c4f26ea40dd9d3b4c31fa5d09cf.jpg
81e289e9ac47a5acb07cbc0ee4e3872c.jpg
b5426360c23172380cbd09e6fcdfde4d.jpg


Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: pk_
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
7,390
Location
Chugiak, Alaska
My personal goal wt. when hunting season comes around is 150-155 lbs. At that wt. I really don't have room to drop more body wt. so my only option is dropping pack wt. The older I get, the less wt. I want to carry on my back and if I can afford to spend more money on lighter, and a lot of times better, gear, I'm going to do it.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
952
Location
Colorado
Obviously you won't be doing winter goat hunts with this stuff and the longevity will be lacking but I ran a lot of this stuff or similar for many years well into montanas rifle seasons and would again if I fell on hard times. Everything else in a pack should be the same as far as weight with kill kits, possible pouches etc can find cheap puffys, fleeces and rain gear very easily as well. I ran an Alaskan pack frame and a dry bag on it that didn't weigh much more than my exo.
9ca1d15c70bc14c9aa7ac44b3633b226.jpg
64c6b9875a38c76d55c56c6e2aef26bb.jpg
55582c4f26ea40dd9d3b4c31fa5d09cf.jpg
81e289e9ac47a5acb07cbc0ee4e3872c.jpg
b5426360c23172380cbd09e6fcdfde4d.jpg


Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Definitely some interesting choices out there...
Gotta compare apples to apples, though.
 

Poser

WKR
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
5,033
Location
Durango CO
I’m about 200 lbs (can be as light as about 190 peak Mtn bike season and heavy as 210-215 coming off a strength cycle going into the Winter season).

Losing 10-12 lbs is fine if we’re talking fat, but I see no advantage to losing 10-12 lbs of lean body mass for hunting. While a hunting pack for 10 days is easily going to push 70#, id rather shoulder that weight at 200# than 185# of Bodyweight since the pack would be perceived as “heavier” at a lighter bodyweight. Again, to be clear, I’m not advising being fat, I’m talking lean body mass here. The other thing is that I’ll probably lose 5-10# over the course of a 10 day hunt, so I’d rather start out a little heavier to come out with as much lean body mass as possible.
 
OP
Where's Bruce?
Joined
Sep 22, 2013
Messages
6,389
The same can said about your weapon. Is a 6.5lb gun that kicks like a mule better than a 10lb gun that is extremely tame and you are more accurate with? Or the guy who packs lots of snivel gear...a bottle of booze, some cigars and filet mignon. No foregone conclusions here, just challenging the notion. Sometimes lighter may not be better. Wait. What?!
 

HuntHarder

WKR
Classified Approved
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
1,946
Location
Phoenix, Az
The same can said about your weapon. Is a 6.5lb gun that kicks like a mule better than a 10lb gun that is extremely tame and you are more accurate with? Or the guy who packs lots of snivel gear...a bottle of booze, some cigars and filet mignon. No foregone conclusions here, just challenging the notion. Sometimes lighter may not be better. Wait. What?!
Yes the 6.5lb gun is better. I do not plan on shooting tight groups when I am hunting. Simply making your first shot count. No kill bottle or ribeyes? You sound like a bundle of joy to go hunting with.
 
Top