That outfitter should check again. This is taken from the Commissioners meeting Gold Sheet when these changes were approved, it is long so I'll skip around to the highlights:
"When the Commission establishes a limit on nonresident deer or elk tags, it shall set aside a maximum of 25% of the statewide nonresident tag limits (IC 36-408(3)). These tags may be allocated for use by outfitted hunters in capped hunts and general season hunts. By administrative rule (IDAPA 13.01.04.500), each year 1,985 deer tags and 2,400 elk (A or B tags) are set aside for sale to persons that have entered into an agreement to use the services of a licensed outfitter. Outfitterset-aside tags are a subset of the total nonresident deer and elk tag quotas (15,500 total deer tags and 12,815 elk tags), not an addition to the total nonresident deer and elk tag quotas. The 1,918 tags allocated to outfitters in capped elk zones are a subset of the outfitter set-aside quotas above. The current outfitter set-aside represents 13% of the tags in the statewide nonresident deer tag quota and 19% of the tags in the nonresident elk tag quota....
....Of the statewide outfitter set-aside of 2,400 elk tags, 1,918 tags are already allocated to the existing capped elk zone A and B tag hunts, leaving a balance of 482 tags to allocate to outfitted hunters in uncapped elk zone A and B tag hunts. All 1,985 deer tags in the outfitter set-aside would be available to allocate as either regular deer tags or white-tailed deer tags to outfitted hunters.....
Staff used outfitter use report data from the Idaho Outfitters and Guides Licensing Board for the two previous hunting seasons for which data were available on hunter participation and outfitted hunter use (2018 and 2019) to calculate, based on our best ability to interpret, the highest outfitter use for regular and white-tailed deer tags by game management unit and elk tags by uncapped elk zone A and B tag. This highest year of use value was used to project potential outfitter allocation for each of the options developed for managing the percentage of nonresident hunters. Staff will propose an allocation of tags for use by outfitted clients based on the number of tags available through the sliding scale proposal for managing the percentage of nonresident tags for uncapped elk zone A and B tags and the highest reported outfitter use in the previous 2 years. However, because the balance of outfitter set-aside tags (482 tags) is insufficient to meet the sum of the total highest use for all A and B tag zones (547 A tags + 272 B tags = 819 tags), the high use value would be pro-rated by 0.588 for each zone. Staff will propose an allocation of tags for use by outfitted clients based on the number of tags available through the sliding scale proposal for regular deer tags and white-tailed deer tags and the highest reported outfitted use in the last 2 years, as long as that total does not exceed 50% of the total nonresident tags for that unit. In any unit where the highest outfitted use exceeds 50% of the total number of nonresident tags available, allocation would be set at 50% of the number of nonresident tags."
I'm not sure what the final allocation is per unit. Seems like the outfitter should be able to figure that out even if the IDFG website is not displaying the Outfitter allocation.