6mm /.243 hunting success on Big Game

Have you killed any others with the 106 TAPs?

I’ve only seen 3 kills with them and all were indistinguishable from a 108 ELDM kill basically.
The TAP factory 6arc loads are hotter - that’s been my only noticeable difference.

I am still debating having my 223 bolt face opened up and throwing on a 6 arc barrel and having that be my one gun.
 
The TAP factory 6arc loads are hotter - that’s been my only noticeable difference.

I am still debating having my 223 bolt face opened up and throwing on a 6 arc barrel and having that be my one gun.
If you're opening a 700 rem bolt....I can trade you a .473 bolt for the 223.
 
16” barrel has them around 2,600, still settling in though and will speed up.
Hey guys. I wanted to clear something up here as apparently I couldn’t read my own writing and I was incorrectly remembering what I wrote down in my field note book.

I went out to check zero on a few guns and to see how much two of my newer barrels were speeding up.

On this 6 creed with 115s, the numbers weren’t making sense to my brain on the garmin. So I dug up my original session from when I shot it unsuppressed and when the barrel was still new.

That session showed an average velocity of 2690 and I had written down what looked like 2590. 😬

Luckily my profile was synced with the correct number from the garmin and not my field notebook chicken scratch.

I did just have to do a profile resync today. The barrel has sped up a lot between break in and adding the suppressor.

Here is the current average velocity of my 16” suppressed 6 creed shooting the current load of 115 Bergers.

IMG_3088.jpeg
 
Have you killed any others with the 106 TAPs?

I’ve only seen 3 kills with them and all were indistinguishable from a 108 ELDM kill basically.

I've only killed 1 muley with 109 ELDm and 1 whitetail with 106 TAPs. Both got shot multiple times though haha. Would agree that no obvious difference was identified.
 
6mm GT = 34% more case capacity than 6mm ARC
6mm Creedmoor = 58% more.

6mm GT case capacity to bore area ratio is identical to that of 6.5mm Creedmoor.
Do you have a full list of the common 6's with these percentages?
6 GT
6 CM
6 PRC
6 SAUM
6 UM

etc. Just curious all the differences (I don't reload).
 
Do you have a full list of the common 6's with these percentages?
6 GT
6 CM
6 PRC
6 SAUM
6 UM
So far just these:
1764097892114.png
I'm using dimensional case capacities from here.

7mm SAUM capacity is .324 in³ -- 6mm will be quite close to that.

I haven't had time yet to reverse-engineer his math so I can arbitrarily add other cartridges (on my list for some big storm that keeps me inside for a few days this winter).
 
The kid logged the first two kills with 6 creed this weekend.

Ruger American Gen 2 22" barrel with factory brake, haven't figured out which can I want to put on it yet. Velo unknown, wasn't going to chrono til I get 60 to 80 rounds through it.

Hornady Match 108 ELD M

Animal 1: 1.5 year old whitetail buck. 95 yards and slight quartered to. Entrance was just behind front shoulder and a little high. Exit was mid body. Caught top of lung, liver, and back of offside lung. Bullet diameter hole through hide and muscle tissue, opened up to 1.5 inches on impact with ribs. 3 separate exit holes, one larger and 2 smaller from shrapnel. Traveled 15 yards before expiring. Enough blood to follow but mostly due to location of entrance and exit, body cavity was full.

Animal 2: yearling whitetail doe. 110 yards and quartered away. Entered the middle of the scapula mid body and bullet was found against the hide mid neck. Dropped immediately. Middle of front shoulder was an absolute mess, unfortunately couldn't save any meat from the front shoulder or neck on that side. Front of onside lung was gone as well. Forgot to get a picture of the rib cage below the scap, I'll see if I can get one yet.

The bullet did exactly what it was expected to although I am concerned with the amount of meat loss moving forward. On the other hand I'm used to killing them with archery equipment so maybe I just need to expect that.

Sorry for the lack of formatting. Tried to add photos in the same order as description
6f42b5afb09a58229e7b42912af1cbcb.jpg
c2fe1c479ef8103aaae008c66f1d103c.jpg
7026ab23f2dd90054fe4c0ea98fbaf7a.jpg
7ab0e400729cbf14491c8be8b4aab8bf.jpg
43bdf800610205a9c76cf513d8b12a34.jpg
3e67675ca865d2c285dbec7b028bf2de.jpg
eccaca3aacee6572b6f1f300df99e455.jpg
306e1a249b3f3775e87bbdcceb900da0.jpg
06cd3abf0412054729d8c219952269e1.jpg


Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
 
What about 6XC?

GRT says .1969in³. I'm pretty sure that's just based on case deminsions but it looks snazzy. 2850 with a 108 ELD-M from an 18" barrel would be nice if real life can match the software.
6xc holds a lil less powder than the 6cm, lil more than a 6x47lapua. 2850 with a 108 from 18in barrel is stable mid psi load in the 6cm, I'm sure the 6xc would do it safely as well. The pitfall of the 6xc, is there have been multiple chamber versions, Tubb 6XC(designed around small base 22-250 brass) , then 6XC II(cip approved, larger base), dies are also a mix for different chamber designs. Some brass on market is designed for the smaller base of original 6xc chambers. Others are larger at base for 6xc II.
 
I'm running the original 6xc and with the norma brass I am spitting the 106tap which has about the longest bearing surface in the 6s at 2960 to 3070 in my few different length guns with all of them shooting 39.5grs of 4350 well enough to be competitive.
 
Back
Top