Defund the police was a racial and inequality issue, not the same.You’re applying the same logic as “defund the police” and it just doesn’t work.
Defund the police was a racial and inequality issue, not the same.You’re applying the same logic as “defund the police” and it just doesn’t work.
So is what you're saying is that state employees get paid either way based on a pay scale. Then they don't need license sale money?
Of course they're a business, they certainly aren't still around because they're losing money. Just look at them combining Parks with Wildlife years ago. Parks was losing money but Wildlife had a surplus, they made the business decision to combine them so wildlife carries Parks. They can tell you each has their own budget but Parks has never brought in a lot of money, until maybe this year with the Parks pass optional with vehicle registrations.
To say any State of Federal agency isn't running itself like a business is laughable they need the operating money to be around, thru fees, taxes and licensing.
I can say I certainly appreciate my customers, we hunters are just customers to CPW so if they don't appreciate my money then I can go spend it else where that's for sure.
No it’s not the same issue, but you’re trying to put the same bandaid on it.Defund the police was a racial and inequality issue, not the same.
Defund the police was a racial and inequality issue, not the same.
I think we’re miscommunicating a bit. To think governments ARE ran like businesses is laughable. I don’t know about you but I pay my taxes because I’m compelled to, not because I think the government is doing a great job and so they deserve my money. Businesses exist because there’s a market for them, their goal is to make a profit and reward their owners and employees as such. Government agencies aren’t trying to make a profit, and in no way reward their employees or executives monetarily on good tax/license sale years. Govt agencies actually do their best to spend as much of their budget as they reasonably can to prove that their service necessitates it (use it or lose it), whereas businesses try to maximize profit (spend the least amount of money possible while still supplying a good service/product)
I’m saying that state employees get paid on a scale and that’s why they do need license sale money. You’re the one advocating for a boycott.
Boycott = no license sale money = no pool of money to pay for hunting related services/employees, thus they are shut down. If no one used roads and no one registered their cars do you expect the government to suddenly redo all the highways and start incredible maintenance programs?
I suppose they are ran similarly to a business in the fact that they need to sell licenses and collect taxes in order to provide services and opportunities. But on the other hand, unlike a business, a boycott would show that they aren’t necessary. It would not entice better services and opportunity.
To put it simply, if we want hunter interests to be looked after then hunter money needs to be present in the pot. If there’s no hunter money in the pot then why would the state be incentivized to provide hunting related services and opportunities?
If you want bird watchers, tourists, and other non-consumptive users to be the main revenue stream and therefore be the primary survey/opinion base for CPW decision making then go ahead with your boycott.
Name a few government agencies that regularly show a profit.To say any State of Federal agency isn't running itself like a business is laughable they need the operating money to be around, thru fees, taxes and licensing.
Name a few government agencies that regularly show a profit.
I'll settle for one.
CPW...If I recall they were $40 million in the black for 2022.Name a few government agencies that regularly show a profit.
I'll settle for one.
That's not counting what forcibly they took from taxpayers?CPW...If I recall they were $40 million in the black for 2022.