Swaro SLC vs Zeiss Conquest

[General RE LEE]

10x42s

Is there much of an upgrade going from the Zeiss Conquest to the Swaro SLC?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[AGPank]

For me the Swarovski view is better to my eyes. I preferred the armor and eye cups of the SLC too.

I don’t know if the price justifies the difference.

I also like the Meostar over the Conquest. Maybe the new Meopta Air is one to meet in the middle.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[MidGAHunter]

To MY eyes, yes...and it isn't close. However, they are very close for a lot of people. Spend some time behind both and let YOUR eyes choose.

 

[2blade]

The slc is definitely better when it comes to controlling chromatic aberration. I prefer the ergonomics as well. Other than that, its pretty close.

 

[PHo]

Short answer - YES

 

[rileybassman]

Good discussion at this thread as well as some of my own experiences.

Zeiss Conquest vs. Swarovski SLC 10x42's

I'm looking at both of these as well - seems the takeaway is to try and look through both of them side by side, on tripods, at low light and let your eyes make the decision.

www.rokslide.com

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk