300 WSM 165 gr vs 180 gr on Elk

Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
49
I am seeking advice from experienced elk hunters. I use Barnes 165 gr TTSX out of a 300 WSM on whitetails with great success. I have little experience with taking elk with a firearm. Is it worth find new ammunition in the 180 gr. to be theoretically more effective by carrying more energy.
 

CJF

WKR
Joined
Jun 11, 2018
Messages
392
Location
CO
I would say it depends on your effective range.

Lots of people on here killin' em with 140ish grain 6.5 Caliber bullets, so the 165 .308 Caliber will definitely kill em. If you are comfortable and accurate with the 165 and aren't shooting long range then the added benefit of the 180 may never be realized.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
1,892
Location
Colorado
At what distance? I wouldn't hesitate or think twice to shoot that 165 TTSX if it shoots out of your gun at something 500 and in. My wife dropped a cow last year with a 129 .260 Accubond at ~300 yards.
 

wytx

WKR
Joined
Feb 2, 2017
Messages
2,097
Location
Wyoming
165 gr is just fine. I've taken many elk , moose and a cow bison with 165-168 gr bonded bullets in my 300wsm.

Good luck on your hunt.
 

Elkangle

WKR
Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Messages
914
So I've done the dance with 300wsm bullet weights...started with the 175 bergers and worked my way up to the 200s.. then played with the eldx bullets for a few kills and then to the hammers back down the 166 grain range...

I'm going to say until the bc becomes a factor youl never know the difference and if anything im thinking the extra speed on the lighter bullets in the moderate distances is to your advantage

Hope this helps
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2013
Messages
2,274
Yes. You’re gonna hear from the “My grandpa killed em with a .243” crowd. Maybe he did but why? You’ll never have a problem with a heavier bullet. Elk aren’t deer. Mountains aren’t farms.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
8,497
There is minimal benefit to going to a 180 barnes. You’d be trading a bullet with a lousy BC for a slower bullet with a lousy BC. 165 TTSX will penetrate fine.

The answer is different if you were shooting lead or long range.
 

Fullfan

WKR
Joined
Jul 31, 2016
Messages
988
Location
Nw/Pa
I reload and shoot the 180ttsx from myKimber Montana in the WSM. Last 3 bulls all dies from one shot. Two were less than perfect shots. The 180@3000fps is a hammer.
 

DropTyne

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
May 11, 2020
Messages
102
The Barnes all copper bullets tend do better with higher velocity. Typically you step down a bullet size when comparing them to lead core bullets.

If your 165 shoots well, move on and go kill an elk. The 165 will certainly shoot flatter and have less recoil than a 180.

FWIW, I'm taking 168 TTSXs with me for my 30-06 this elk season. Good luck!
 

Dr. Rx

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Mar 7, 2018
Messages
129
It’s funny
I just went the opposite way
I have 180 gr E tips for our state of communist California
But went with an entirely different Set up for a true western states rifle, I went with 200 gr Accubond

just wanted a bigger thumper

probably tomato tomaaaato

Oh well if I have to shoot cross canyon with wind.. I’m ready
kris
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2013
Messages
2,274
Sure , good point.


But, would you feel safe hiding behind an elk if someone was shooting 165gr bullets at you from a 300wsm?
If you had to stand behind an elk and pick my bullet would you prefer a 165 grainer or my 200 grain Accubond? I always told my clients.... killing elk doesn’t just mean making them dead. It also means finding them. Everyone knows how tough it can be to find a deer that doesn’t drop in it’s tracks. Times that by 100 if you don’t anchor your bull on the spot. They are big and tough and can go a long way on 3 legs and one lung down the side of a mountain into hell holes rarely seen by man.
 
Top