7mm08 119 Absolute hammer

Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
2,597
Location
Somewhere between here and there
If you get on the hammer forum on their website, under reloading, you should be able to find a spreadsheet with load data guys have been using with the absolute hammers.

You will want a pretty fast powder, you’re probably going to want something in the Varget to H4895 burn rate.
 

jzeblaz

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
278
Location
Santa Rosa, CA
I used H4350 with the 120 HH and it worked great. I'm not sure about the AH, different profile? Great bullets.
 

Ddubs20

FNG
Joined
Jan 17, 2023
Messages
75
Location
GJ Colorado
The only loads in there are 45.0 TAC,and 45.0 leverevolution. Around 3000FPS, I would stick in that burn rate area, maybe benchmark, 8208xbr
 

MThuntr

WKR
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
1,024
Location
SW MT
Personally, I'd go with the 120HH and use Varget or one of it's copies. It's just a more efficient bullet with a more stable powder.
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Messages
2,896
Location
Western Iowa
Yes. The profile is such ogive does not contact the lands. You can use a fast powder for the cartridge to achieve higher velocities.
For 7-08, Staball 6.5 and Big Game Hunter deliver some of the fastest velocities.

FWIW, I've been loading some 120 Nosler NBT lately to pressure test with SB 6.5, and the powder is in the case neck at 51 and near the top at 53. According to the Hodgdon reloading data, 53 is max compressed. I haven't had a chance to test pressure, and I'm starting at 51 in my Tikka. YMMV
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
2,597
Location
Somewhere between here and there
For 7-08, Staball 6.5 and Big Game Hunter deliver some of the fastest velocities.

FWIW, I've been loading some 120 Nosler NBT lately to pressure test with SB 6.5, and the powder is in the case neck at 51 and near the top at 53. According to the Hodgdon reloading data, 53 is max compressed. I haven't had a chance to test pressure, and I'm starting at 51 in my Tikka. YMMV

I’m guessing these are too slow for optimal velocities with the absolute hammers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
2,597
Location
Somewhere between here and there
I’m no expert, but I know Varget delivers lower velocity than these 2 for 120 class bullets on up in 7-08.
I’m not arguing with traditional bullets. The AH use a fast burn rate for cartridge powder because they have less bearing surface than traditional bullets. I believe the powders you listed are in the 4350-4831 burn rate, which would be too slow for maximizing velocity with the AH.
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Messages
2,896
Location
Western Iowa
I’m not arguing with traditional bullets. The AH use a fast burn rate for cartridge powder because they have less bearing surface than traditional bullets. I believe the powders you listed are in the 4350-4831 burn rate, which would be too slow for maximizing velocity with the AH.
Got it and thank you for explaining that. It wasn’t making sense that bullets of roughly the same weight would react so differently. I may give them a try!
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
2,597
Location
Somewhere between here and there
Got it and thank you for explaining that. It wasn’t making sense that bullets of roughly the same weight would react so differently. I may give them a try!
It’s always worth contacting Steve at Hammer for recommendations. Sometimes you also have to play with magnum vs standard primers for best results. I am getting 3100 fps with 123 AH in my 6.5 CM.
 
Top