Colorado wolves released today

Joined
Jul 30, 2015
Messages
5,768
Location
Lenexa, KS
Why would they announce the location, given the vote was so close, some see their livelihood threatened and there are a vocal (minority) actually making mostly veiled threats.

ed841b_f36fa5f8eb8b4e37b7e758fd5798fd0f~mv2.jpeg
 

1jeds

FNG
Joined
Dec 21, 2021
Messages
57
Elk did decrease. Dramatically. As did moose and bighorn sheep. They are learning and adapting. Look up what happened to the Northern Yellowstone herd if it hasn't been scrubbed from the internet.

Where are you seeing that elk decreased? I'm looking at fish and game numbers and overall populations have grown, and Wyoming is even saying some herds are overpopulated. I did see the Yellowstone herd was reduced by about 50%. I have no clue what the carrying capacity of that environment is, I'll leave that to the wildlife biologists.

The argument from the pro-wolf crowd is that local herds will be impacted (i.e. Yellowstone), but overall elk numbers and harvests will not be (i.e. Fish and Game numbers seem to support this). That's what I'm trying to reconcile, because it makes no sense to me why they would increase or even remain stable with wolves introduced.

The biggest issue I have personally is leaving this decision up to the voting public who have no clue about the potential impacts.
 

CorbLand

WKR
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
6,878
It was. It passed by less than one percentage point. Got put on the ballot by having enough signatures on a petition. Gotta love democracy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That is what I thought.

For everyone that is saying "what as hunters can we do about this?" or "when are we going to stand up to things like this?" The single best thing you can do starting out is not blaming people that didnt have control over the situation. If CPW had no ability to stop this and it was forced on them, then going to them and blaming them is the single worst thing you can do. Its like blaming a floor associate at a store for something corporate did.
 

CorbLand

WKR
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
6,878
Yes. Ageed ( for some of them possibly) Forced as in pressured. Not forced as physically forced or required.
Forced as in they had one of two choices. Quit or do what they were told to do. Not saying someone put a gun to their head. I know this is an emotionally charged time but lets use some common sense.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2016
Messages
412
I am going to point out to the people of Colorado. How dangerous it will be if a dog that had distemper got around those wolves. Wolves are not immune to distemper and it lives in the soil for a long time. It woud be terrible if an animal that had distemper or the soil from its kennel was to make it up near an wolf kill. It could wipe out the whole pack. So be careful.

I can almost guarantee that those wolves have been better vaccinated than most pets.

The MI DNR was vaccinating wolves that were bycatch in coyote traps before they’d release them. Trappers don’t call anymore.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2023
Messages
471
Where are you seeing that elk decreased? I'm looking at fish and game numbers and overall populations have grown, and Wyoming is even saying some herds are overpopulated. I did see the Yellowstone herd was reduced by about 50%. I have no clue what the carrying capacity of that environment is, I'll leave that to the wildlife biologists.

The argument from the pro-wolf crowd is that local herds will be impacted (i.e. Yellowstone), but overall elk numbers and harvests will not be (i.e. Fish and Game numbers seem to support this). That's what I'm trying to reconcile, because it makes no sense to me why they would increase or even remain stable with wolves introduced.

The biggest issue I have personally is leaving this decision up to the voting public who have no clue about the potential impacts.
They decreased. Fact. As I said, look up what happened to the Northern Yellowstone herd. NOW they are coming back, adapting, changing behaviors and locations. Expect the elk hunting as you currently know it ( in areas the wolves establish as their territories) to be crap for a good 20-25 years at least.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2023
Messages
471
Forced as in they had one of two choices. Quit or do what they were told to do. Not saying someone put a gun to their head. I know this is an emotionally charged time but lets use some common sense.
Agreed.

"Just doin' muh job"

Weak sauce.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2016
Messages
412
@Hnthrdr gets it. It took Idaho 11 years AFTER the agreed population was achieved to get a hunt established. The damage was done 5 years after reintroduction.

I believe Michigan hit its stated goal in 1999 (200). We still do not have a hunt and “science” tells us the population is approaching 700. Most will tell you it’s probably double that.

You’ll never see a hunt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Luked

WKR
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
955
I saw the video yesterday and made me sick. Im not a CO resident and have not hunted out west as much as most of the people on this board but even at that it makes me sick to see this.
It really blows my mind how stupid people are anymore on how the outdoors and wildlife works. Its sad that our socicity has gotten to where it is now.

If you really want to see some stupid comments, for those that have instagram go check out the comments on the post that Colorado Parks and wildlife has on the post about the wolf release. I have never read such ignorance in my life.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2016
Messages
412
There is someone watching those GPS trackers night and day right now and foreseeably for the next few years. Some little geek in a back room of a govt building somewhere whose sole job is to stare at a screen and collect a paycheck. Know that.

If those trackers stop moving or transmit a terminal signal, there will likely be a chopper in the air if there is enough daylight left to fly....be a shame one of those woofs died at night or in the late evening. They probably wouldn't be able to get out there to see what happened until the morning.

They really want these wolves to succeed. It's all part of the liberal plan to replace hunters from the equation.

They can’t monitor them 24/7. It’s just like your phone and inreach . The more you use it to track the faster the battery dies. They usually send location data once a day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Scottyboy

WKR
Joined
Dec 17, 2016
Messages
1,096
Location
Minnesota
I believe Michigan hit its stated goal in 1999 (200). We still do not have a hunt and “science” tells us the population is approaching 700. Most will tell you it’s probably double that.

You’ll never see a hunt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I would agree with this. Minnesota is way beyond its goal, I believe the current estimate is around 2700-3000.

The odds we ever see a hunt again, I would say is less than 0%.
 

UncleBone

WKR
Joined
Aug 18, 2022
Messages
693
They can’t monitor them 24/7. It’s just like your phone and inreach . The more you use it to track the faster the battery dies. They usually send location data once a day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I saw a guy on twitter claiming they were tracking them with collars and sattelites. Like they can see every move they make constantly. Cpw even says the wolves are rough on their collars, meaning they could tear them off and ditch them.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2016
Messages
412
I saw a guy on twitter claiming they were tracking them with collars and sattelites. Like they can see every move they make constantly. Cpw even says the wolves are rough on their collars, meaning they could tear them off and ditch them.

I’m sure they are, but think about it. There’s an internal battery that’s not getting charged. If that thing was sending signals out every 5-10 minutes it’d be dead in days.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top