Interesting poaching case from Wyoming going before Supreme Court

Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
302
https://www.indianz.com/News/2018/09/25/tribal-hunting-rights-case-before-us-sup.asp

Interesting read if you are into legal cases. I haven't heard about this until today.
So apparently 3 guys (one of whom was a game warden in the Crow tribe!)started hunting on the Crow reservation but went off the reservation into Wyoming. Shot 3 elk. Got caught. Got convicted. Now the case is in front of SCOTUS.
The thing that is really interesting to me is, that if he is found to have hunting rights that supersede state game laws, does that mean any Native American can go hunt whatever and whenever he likes?!
Hoping I'm jumping to conclusions here and I'm way off.
 
Last edited:

Chico103

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
115
Location
Northern California
Natives have a ton of fish and game rights in some places. The tribes here in California can net salmon from the rivers and sell them. Can’t wait to see what the SCOTUS has to say about it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

jmez

WKR
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
7,428
Location
Piedmont, SD
https://www.indianz.com/News/2018/09/25/tribal-hunting-rights-case-before-us-sup.asp

Interesting read if you are into legal cases. I haven't heard about this until today.
So apparently 3 guys (one of whom was a game warden in the Crow tribe!)started hunting on the Crow reservation but went off the reservation into Wyoming. Shot 3 elk. Got caught. Got convicted. Now the case is in front of SCOTUS.
The thing that is really interesting to me is, that if he is found to have hunting rights the supersede state game laws, does that mean any Native American can go hunt whatever and whenever he likes?!
Hoping I'm jumping to conclusions here and I'm way off.
That is exactly what it means. It would be a disaster.

Sent from my moto z3 using Tapatalk
 

tdhanses

WKR
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
5,739
Does that mean only on unoccupied lands? Wonder what the definition of occupied lands was when the treaty was established. Also maybe the treaty needs to be relooked at in this modern age, not to start an argument on that though but in my opinion worth looking at.

If the SCOTUS does rule in favor this could change game management in all states as it would give all Indians this right not just one tribe, right?

Wonder how the closing of Federal lands in AK to everyone but the Natives will possibly play into this.
 

JWP58

WKR
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
2,090
Location
Boulder, CO
This could be a big deal...in the wrong way depending on the ruling.

Technically for it to apply to all states it would have to be appealed to the u.s. supreme court for a ruling.
 
Joined
Nov 7, 2012
Messages
7,482
Location
S. UTAH
Guess it's time to get one of those DNA tests and see how much Indian is in me. Sure would be nice to say good bye to collecting points.:p
 
OP
C
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
302
Does that mean only on unoccupied lands? Wonder what the definition of occupied lands was when the treaty was established. Also maybe the treaty needs to be relooked at in this modern age, not to start an argument on that though but in my opinion worth looking at.

If the SCOTUS does rule in favor this could change game management in all states as it would give all Indians this right not just one tribe, right?

Wonder how the closing of Federal lands in AK to everyone but the Natives will possibly play into this.

I'd say it could be limited to the negotiating parties of the treaty. So I think for now it only applies to the Crow tribe. But this sets a dangerous precedent in other cases where other treaties have negotiated hunting rights. Depending on the ruling, a lot of tribal hunters are going to be brushing up on what a 150+ year old treaties says about hunting.
 

Jskaanland

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
1,723
Location
Washington
I'd say it could be limited to the negotiating parties of the treaty. So I think for now it only applies to the Crow tribe. But this sets a dangerous precedent in other cases where other treaties have negotiated hunting rights. Depending on the ruling, a lot of tribal hunters are going to be brushing up on what a 150+ year old treaties says about hunting.

Court precedence would affect other tribes with similar wording, not the just the Crow Nation. In the same way, Brown v Board didn't just apply the Topeka school district. While it doesn't change the law, lower courts will use this ruling to guide their rulings going forward.
 

jmez

WKR
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
7,428
Location
Piedmont, SD
This could be a big deal...in the wrong way depending on the ruling.

Technically for it to apply to all states it would have to be appealed to the u.s. supreme court for a ruling.
The US Supreme Court I'd going to make the ruling.

Sent from my moto z3 using Tapatalk
 

Wrench

WKR
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
5,668
Location
WA
The tribe I work with can hunt into Canada and most of northern central Washington. You should see the bucks these dudes kill.
 
OP
C
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
302
The tribe I work with can hunt into Canada and most of northern central Washington. You should see the bucks these dudes kill.

I believe it. I did some volunteer work up on a few reservations in northern Minnesota 20 years ago that involved a lot of knocking on doors. There were some VERY impressive whitetails nailed up on walls up there.
 

CorbLand

WKR
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
6,805
Oh boy this could be interesting


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

#1antler

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Feb 19, 2015
Messages
252
Please research the Burkett Treaty involving the Southern Utes near Ignacio, Co. I've had members tell me they have hunting rights in much of public land in San Juans that you and I are required to draw tags for including bighorn sheep.
 
Joined
Sep 23, 2017
Messages
630
Guess it's time to get one of those DNA tests and see how much Indian is in me. Sure would be nice to say good bye to collecting points.:p





“I used to get made fun of all the time for being French, but since my DNA test came back 12% Navajo- No ones laughing at at me anymore.


Or my people.”
 
Last edited:

BluMtn

WKR
Joined
Nov 24, 2016
Messages
1,018
Location
Washington
The tribe I work with can hunt into Canada and most of northern central Washington. You should see the bucks these dudes kill.

Same in my corner of the state. Except they kill a lot of branched antlered bull elk. I guess they don't like cow elk meat.
 

SHTF

WKR
Classified Approved
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
5,096
Location
Colorado
Guess it's time to get one of those DNA tests and see how much Indian is in me. Sure would be nice to say good bye to collecting points.:p

Indians are from India..... Native Americans are from here. :mad:
 

jspradley

WKR
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
1,725
Location
League City, TX
I am curious to see how this ends up, on one hand if that's what the treaty says then so be it. The US Govt has already screwed over the natives enough, on the other hand that could turn out to be a disaster...
 
Top