- Banned
- #41
Newtosavage
WKR
Supply and demand is exactly right.The downside of leases or paying to hunt becoming the norm is that the demand outweighs the supply driving the prices up the leases up. People with deep pockets are willing to pay more and more just to have leases to themselves. The recreational value of the land is starting to outweigh the production value. I have in laws in TX that have seen the prices of land soar in the last few years. Farm or ranch land that is worth 1000 an acre is being sold at 3000 an acre marketed as recreational land and it all sells too, usually to fat cats from the city. Not saying it's right or wrong it is capitalism in full force. I do believe that it contributes to hunting becoming a exclusive rich man's sport that much faster.
My experience is that if you are from the area you likely have some connections to hunt private for free weather you work it off or just through the relationship. I have worked on a farm just to hunt and I take pride in hunting and finding success on public.
At least there is still millions of acres of public we already pay taxes for. The talk with paying someones taxes to hunt is a little weird to me. Whatever you and the landowner agree on together should be good enough. Damn all you freeloaders lol
Texas has so little public land that the "supply" is low so demand is high for recreational land. Where I live, land that would have been viewed as near worthless for agricultural production 30 years ago because of the brush/trees on it, is now more valuable than cleared farmland or pasture. Go figure.
30 million people and less than 3% public land is a recipe for high priced recreational land.
You can joke about the freeloader comment but the chickens will come home to roost eventually, even on the vast tracts of public land, as development pressures increase along with the population. More and more elected officials will want to "make money" off that public land and more of the public will agree with them so long as the people who use that land aren't paying what a commercial interest would pay. Look what's happening already with Colorado leasing large tracts of state land that used to be open to public hunting. Last October, my buddy and I watched herds of elk on a large tract of state land, bedded within 1/4 mi. of a busy highway. That land used to be open to public hunting but is now being leased by the state to a private interest who is willing to pay more than public hunters are and non-hunting state taxpayers want it that way.
I've said for a long time that part of what we are up against is the mentality created by 2 or 3 generations of Americans that grew up enjoying the use of government-subsidized recreation areas. State and Federal parks, NF and BLM, etc. that didn't charge enough to recoup their costs had us all thinking everything should be free or close to it. And that's a mentality that's tough to break.
The longer we hang on to that, the further behind the curve we will get.