I’m used to seeing various loads for round like .308 vary by 1-3 grains of a given powder for similar bullets of the same weight, maybe using different brands of brass, primers, etc.
Lately though, while researching 45-70 loads with a Sierra 300 grain, I’ve found some load data that seems downright contradictory.
Hogdons data has a minor conflict of velocity with a trapdoor load Showing 1826 FPS with 57 grains of powder, and out of a lever action, the same bullet, powder, case, barrel length, etc, shows a velocity of 1800 FPS with 58.5 grains of the same powder.
The Sierra manual/app suggests that 52 grains of this powder should produce 1800fps with the same bullet.
The Sierra manual also seems to suggest in one section that 48.4 grains is a safe load, and in the lever action loads section, suggests that anything under 59.7 grains is a low pressure load that should be approached with caution.
All this data relates to the Sierra 300 grain JHP pro hunter, and IMR 4895. Why the wide spread of safe vs unsafe powder weights and seemingly contradictory data?
Lately though, while researching 45-70 loads with a Sierra 300 grain, I’ve found some load data that seems downright contradictory.
Hogdons data has a minor conflict of velocity with a trapdoor load Showing 1826 FPS with 57 grains of powder, and out of a lever action, the same bullet, powder, case, barrel length, etc, shows a velocity of 1800 FPS with 58.5 grains of the same powder.
The Sierra manual/app suggests that 52 grains of this powder should produce 1800fps with the same bullet.
The Sierra manual also seems to suggest in one section that 48.4 grains is a safe load, and in the lever action loads section, suggests that anything under 59.7 grains is a low pressure load that should be approached with caution.
All this data relates to the Sierra 300 grain JHP pro hunter, and IMR 4895. Why the wide spread of safe vs unsafe powder weights and seemingly contradictory data?