I don't think you should have to buy a tag, it's pretty much a pet or livestock. How do deer farms work? You don't need a tag to kill them there.If I all ready own the animal, why do I have to buy a tag before I can shoot it?
Honestly, why is it different from any other farming?
It's certainly not my thing, but if people want to spend their money to go do it, I don't really care.
Any other type of farming doesn't involve "taking an animals life for sport", and there aren't large, well funded, organized and ignorant groups of people actively trying to take away said farming practices. If we as hunters do not police our own ranks, those in society that do not hunt certainly will. Why make it easier for the opposition?
I absolutely don’t think it’s sustainable for everyone to hunt. And I don’t really make a distinction as to “sport” or whatever when I hunt, I hunt because I have all of my life and because I love to. But, like it or not, less than 10% of our population hunts, less than 10% of our population is anti hunting… the other 80% doesn’t really care BUT they do have the ability to impact our ability to hunt. So I think it’s really important that we as hunters do so ethically and responsibly and be as good of an examples as we can. Guys paying to walk inside a fence and shoot a caged animal does not portray us in a good way. That simply isn’t hunting and I don’t think we should pretend it is.So it's taking an animals life for sport that you are drawing the line at?
That's a scary one to me. I believe most any hunt can be classified as that, otherwise everyone would be raising their own food, it's more efficient.
And I get why you want to hunt for your meat, buy you can't honestly think it's sustainable for everyone to do thar right?
I absolutely don’t think it’s sustainable for everyone to hunt. And I don’t really make a distinction as to “sport” or whatever when I hunt, I hunt because I have all of my life and because I love to. But, like it or not, less than 10% of our population hunts, less than 10% of our population is anti hunting… the other 80% doesn’t really care BUT they do have the ability to impact our ability to hunt. So I think it’s really important that we as hunters do so ethically and responsibly and be as good of an examples as we can. Guys paying to walk inside a fence and shoot a caged animal does not portray us in a good way. That simply isn’t hunting and I don’t think we should pretend it is.
Totally see where you’re going, and it’s a solid point! But I think once you get into the high fence hunting realm, conservation, management, fair chase… all of that goes out the window and you get into dangerous territory and killing for the sake of killing. That why both P&Y and B&C don’t recognize it as fair chase. Everyone has their opinion on it, but personally I don’t think its hunting at all.Its my opinion,
hunting poor kitty cats and doggies doesnt potray us in a good way.
Neither those houndsmen that chase animals down and torture them with dogs.
Dont even get me started on those guys who chase bambit with dogs.
See where I'm going with this?
I absolutely don’t think it’s sustainable for everyone to hunt. And I don’t really make a distinction as to “sport” or whatever when I hunt, I hunt because I have all of my life and because I love to. But, like it or not, less than 10% of our population hunts, less than 10% of our population is anti hunting… the other 80% doesn’t really care BUT they do have the ability to impact our ability to hunt. So I think it’s really important that we as hunters do so ethically and responsibly and be as good of an examples as we can. Guys paying to walk inside a fence and shoot a caged animal does not portray us in a good way. That simply isn’t hunting and I don’t think we should pretend it is.
That why both P&Y and B&C don’t recognize it as fair chase.
Again, from my perspective and in my opinion when hunting, trapping, etc… can stand on conservation and management as a tool it gives us a legitimate keg to stand on. When it’s basically livestock inside a fence, none of that applies. At that point it’s just killing to kill. If that is how someone chooses to procure their meat or whatever, that’s on them. But I whole heartedly don’t think anyone should pretend it’s the same as fair chase pursuit of wild animals.So what about someone shooting an animal in a trap?
Or what about bowhunting? I'm sure a lot of people think that is a lot more inhumane than rifle hunting.
I think we mostly agree. I believe hunters need to be very careful of how the public perceives us. Social media is putting so much out there to people who aren't otherwise exposed to it, a lot of it isn't good. Influencers have found a new kind of market hunting, and the more clicks the more $. Controversy pays. Different subject, but kinda where this is heading.
I just don't view stuff inside a fence as any different than livestock. I don't think anyone getting upset over someone shooting a deer much cares which side of a fence they are on.
And I agree that we mostly agree. I also agree that social media is doing a fantastic job of making hunters look like d-bags!So what about someone shooting an animal in a trap?
Or what about bowhunting? I'm sure a lot of people think that is a lot more inhumane than rifle hunting.
I think we mostly agree. I believe hunters need to be very careful of how the public perceives us. Social media is putting so much out there to people who aren't otherwise exposed to it, a lot of it isn't good. Influencers have found a new kind of market hunting, and the more clicks the more $. Controversy pays. Different subject, but kinda where this is heading.
I just don't view stuff inside a fence as any different than livestock. I don't think anyone getting upset over someone shooting a deer much cares which side of a fence they are on.
high fence hunting realm, conservation, management, fair chase…
But I whole heartedly don’t think anyone should pretend it’s the same as fair chase pursuit of wild animals.