Razor 56 and Swaro 56

[TimberHunter]

Has anyone been able to compare side by side in the field?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Hnthrdr]

@Tahoe1305 did a write up, I have owned both, sold the razor before I purchased the ATC. The ATC is clear edge to edge, is a tad heavier. No built in arca rail, better focus and zoom adjustments and a much nicer scope. The razor for 900ish bucks is a solid scope though… not sure I got an extra 1500 of value, but I wanted to be done buying glass until I draw a sheep/ goat tag.

 

[Tahoe1305]

The Rokslide Members' GIANT Optics Review

In this giant optics review, a group of Rokslide members got together to compare a long list of optics in real field conditions.

www.rokslide.com

Compared here.

Swaro is better. But mostly in ergos. Vortex 1/2lb lighter. Center resolution very close. Agree edge to edge to swaro but not by much. Color better on swaro.

Most folks likely aren’t scanning with them. If purpose is examining things found with binos, digiscoping ,etc…I think both will work well.

Up to end user if 3x cost is worth some finer points like smoother controls, better color/contrast, etc.

I’m a weight winnie and have alpha binos to find stuff. The razor checks enough boxes in the sub $1k realm for me, I kept it. Swaro is better, but a future me problem.