what do you think he will score?

[velvetfvr]

I see 178-181" there. I think he's bigger than the pic gives him credit for.

 

[armyjoe]

View attachment 6362

Here is another photo of that buck. I have thousands of pics of big mulies like this guy. Here is the one I thought was the oldest and biggest bodied mulie I've seen in this area I go

View attachment 6363

 

[sk1]

links not working for those pics

 

[CW_12]

I'd have to say mid 160s. We chased a deer in NM that was very similar to this buck. No doubt. Choot em Liz!!!!!

 

[robby denning]

Robby manned up, so here is my guess using Robby's "both sides average" score:

1" G1
13" G2
9" G3
11" G4
22" MBs
20" IS
30" mass
2" non-typ on right G3

Gross 164

Matt, I could be high on those G2's, but I don't think I'm that high. Bucks with 13" G2 look "short" and I don't think he does. He might have 15" G2, dropping my guess into the 170's, but I just can't see 13" G2.

'course I'm wearing reading glasses to type this.

 

[Tdiesel]

I'm saying around 174 but we are all just guessing

 

[Matt Cashell]

Matt, I could be high on those G2's, but I don't think I'm that high. Bucks with 13" G2 look "short" and I don't think he does. He might have 15" G2, dropping my guess into the 170's, but I just can't see 13" G2.

'course I'm wearing reading glasses to type this.

That's OK Robby, I am just making my best guess too. To me he looks like one of those bucks that looks bigger than he is because his frame is scaled down a little bit. In any case, the only way to know is to put the tape on him. Maybe AJ can find his sheds!

I think he is a great looking deer still.

This one went 164 and change, and I think they are similar deer:

I was proud of him, whatever the score.

 

[robby denning]

oh ya, that's a pretty buck and good pic.
AJ, go pick up those sheds this afternoon so we can relieve the tension.

 

[Evan Williams]

Robby,

I am more along your lines....

I was looking 190 Gross. Look at the Depth in the forks! Would like to see a little more mass but he carries what he has!

 

[Shoot straight]

Ya no. Those aren't 17".

 

[Coyote Commander]

Very strong fronts and backs, ok mass (not spindly but not heavy) and he carries it consistently up through his rack, decent mains and good, "box" frame size.

I think 180 is too generous, 160 is pretty stingy. I bet he grosses low 170s or thereabouts pretty easily. Ill go......171 2/8

Whats more, he looks like he's young too.


Now go shoot him so we know who won!

 

[Foldem]

I think he'd break 180" gross if he had better eye guards. I would shoot him for sure.

Kevin

 

[Jeff Rogers]

I say 180 for sure if he had some good G1s His outside spread looks to be 26 to 27 it would be easier if his ears were forward.

 

[Stinky Coyote]

Man, I must be outta practice. I'm getting 185+ Gross
based on averaging each G score
2" G1
17" G2
12" G3
12" G4
22" MBs
22" IS
33" mass
3" non-typ on right G3

I'm with u, with one caveat, body size, the pic says he's a little guy to me but if that rack is sitting on a 260-80 lb minimum muley I see a 190 gross, never under estimate forks like that, my 203 had what I thought was a 180 frame until the tape hit him, all fork gain. Anyhow, he looks little bodied and youngish to me and if so he's still gonna push 175 plus by my guessing. If he's young as he looks in that pic, huge potential for booner there IMO, hard to let em grow when they look like that tho.

 

[Gznokes]

175.
Nice buck